UseRightAI
UseRightAI logo
HomeModelsAsk AIComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAI
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.
UseRightAI logo
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTAll comparisons →Build your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

Model Directory

Compare AI models without the clutter

Search, filter, and sort every tracked model by provider, use case, pricing tier, speed, and context window — all in one place.

Rankings refresh dailyScored on 6 criteriaNo paid rankings
Instant answer

If you want the shortest answer: Claude Fable 5 for coding and writing, Mistral Small 3.1 for cost-sensitive work, and Claude 4 Haiku when latency and throughput matter most.

Use the directory to compare by the thing that actually changes the decision: coding benchmark score, writing quality, cost per million tokens, speed, or context window size. That usually narrows the right model in under a minute.

The current directory includes 23 models across multiple providers, with all entries mapped to the same pricing, speed, and use-case structure.

Compare pricingWhich AI should I use?

Clear recommendation block

The shortest way to see the safest default, the lower-cost option, and the specialist pick before you read deeper.

Best overall model

Claude Fable 5

View
Why this recommendation

Claude Fable 5 is the safest premium default when you want one model that covers the most ground well.

AnthropicPremium
Best for
The hardest coding tasks, autonomous multi-step agents, and frontier-grade reasoning
Price
$10.00/1M
Context
1M tokens
Best budget model

Mistral Small 3.1

View
Why this recommendation

Mistral Small 3.1 is the best low-cost default when value per token matters more than flagship quality.

MistralBudget
Best for
Ultra-high-volume classification, summarisation, and lightweight vision tasks
Price
$0.10/1M
Context
128k tokens
Best for speed

Claude 4 Haiku

View
Why this recommendation

Claude 4 Haiku is the fastest broad-use option when latency matters more than maximum reasoning depth.

AnthropicBudget
Best for
Fast budget writing, support automation, and cost-sensitive Anthropic integrations
Price
$0.80/1M
Context
200k tokens
Comparison table

Compare the tradeoffs

This table compares the defaults most people actually need to understand first: best overall, best budget, fastest broad-use option, and the strongest cheap coding specialist.

AnthropicPremium

Claude Fable 5

New global #1 — 80.3% SWE-Bench Pro, the most capable model generally available.

Best for
The hardest coding tasks, autonomous multi-step agents, and frontier-grade reasoning
Speed
Deliberate
Input cost
$10.00/1M
Output cost
$50.00/1M
Context
1M tokens
MistralBudget

Mistral Small 3.1

Ultra-cheap multimodal model for massive-volume, low-complexity pipelines.

Best for
Ultra-high-volume classification, summarisation, and lightweight vision tasks
Speed
Very fast
Input cost
$0.10/1M
Output cost
$0.30/1M
Context
128k tokens
AnthropicBudget

Claude 4 Haiku

Best low-cost writing option for fast-moving content teams.

Best for
Fast budget writing, support automation, and cost-sensitive Anthropic integrations
Speed
Very fast
Input cost
$0.80/1M
Output cost
$4.00/1M
Context
200k tokens
xAIBalanced

Grok 4

Strong coding value with 2M context — an underrated pick at this price.

Best for
Coding and research at competitive pricing with maximum context
Speed
Fast
Input cost
$2.00/1M
Output cost
$6.00/1M
Context
2M tokens
ModelProviderBest forInputOutputContextSpeed
Claude Fable 5
New global #1 — 80.3% SWE-Bench Pro, the most capable model generally available.
AnthropicThe hardest coding tasks, autonomous multi-step agents, and frontier-grade reasoning$10.00/1M$50.00/1M1M tokensDeliberate
Mistral Small 3.1
Ultra-cheap multimodal model for massive-volume, low-complexity pipelines.
MistralUltra-high-volume classification, summarisation, and lightweight vision tasks$0.10/1M$0.30/1M128k tokensVery fast
Claude 4 Haiku
Best low-cost writing option for fast-moving content teams.
AnthropicFast budget writing, support automation, and cost-sensitive Anthropic integrations$0.80/1M$4.00/1M200k tokensVery fast
Grok 4
Strong coding value with 2M context — an underrated pick at this price.
xAICoding and research at competitive pricing with maximum context$2.00/1M$6.00/1M2M tokensFast

When to use what

Use this as a practical filter before you start browsing the whole directory. It shows which leading option fits each common decision style and where it becomes the wrong pick.

Best overall default

Claude Fable 5

Model page

New global #1 — 80.3% SWE-Bench Pro, the most capable model generally available.

When to use

The hardest coding tasks, autonomous multi-step agents, and frontier-grade reasoning

When not to use

You are latency- or cost-sensitive, or your tasks don't need frontier-level reasoning — Opus 4.8 at half the price is plenty.

Best budget default

Mistral Small 3.1

Model page

Ultra-cheap multimodal model for massive-volume, low-complexity pipelines.

When to use

Ultra-high-volume classification, summarisation, and lightweight vision tasks

When not to use

You need reliable multi-step reasoning or coding quality — it won't hold up.

Best for speed

Claude 4 Haiku

Model page

Best low-cost writing option for fast-moving content teams.

When to use

Fast budget writing, support automation, and cost-sensitive Anthropic integrations

When not to use

Cost is your only concern — Gemini 3.1 Flash offers similar value with a larger context window.

Best cheap coding pick

Grok 4

Model page

Strong coding value with 2M context — an underrated pick at this price.

When to use

Coding and research at competitive pricing with maximum context

When not to use

You need the highest writing quality or the most reliable production-grade output — Claude wins both.

Filter the directory

23 models matched. Explore by provider, use case, price tier, and speed.

Best overall sorting active
All providersAll use casesAll pricingBest overall
xAIBalancedCoding

Grok 4

xAI's latest flagship with strong coding benchmark performance, a 2M token context window, and aggressive pricing at $2/$6 per million tokens.

Verdict
Strong coding value with 2M context — an underrated pick at this price.
Quality score
83%
Pricing
$2.00/1M in
$6.00/1M out
Speed
Fast
Best for coding and research at competitive pricing with maximum context
Context
2M tokens
Best when you want near-flagship coding quality with a massive context window at a mid-tier price.
Coding2M contextValuexAI
Best for
Coding and research at competitive pricing with maximum context
View model
GoogleBudgetBest budget

Gemini 3.1 Flash

Fast, low-cost model with a 1M token context window — the best budget default for teams running high prompt volumes.

Verdict
Best cheap AI for broad day-to-day work — now with 1M context.
Quality score
75%
Pricing
$0.50/1M in
$3.00/1M out
Speed
Very fast
Best for high-volume everyday ai usage where speed and cost both matter
Context
1M tokens
The default budget pick for startups watching cost. The 1M context at this price is unmatched.
Best budgetFast1M contextScalable
Best for
High-volume everyday AI usage where speed and cost both matter
View model
GooglePremiumResearch leader

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Google's flagship with the largest context window of any frontier model at 2M tokens, Deep Think reasoning, and the best price-to-performance among premium models.

Verdict
Best for research and deep document analysis — 2M context at the best premium price.
Quality score
89%
Pricing
$2.00/1M in
$12.00/1M out
Speed
Balanced
Best for research, deep document analysis, and long-context reasoning at competitive pricing
Context
2M tokens
The 2M context window is a genuine competitive advantage — no other frontier model gets close for document-heavy workflows.
Research leader2M contextBest value premiumDeep Think
Best for
Research, deep document analysis, and long-context reasoning at competitive pricing
View model
MistralBudgetCoding specialist

Codestral 25.01

Coding-specialist model designed for fast engineering assistance at a budget-conscious price point.

Verdict
Best budget-focused coding specialist for high-volume developer teams.
Quality score
57%
Pricing
$0.90/1M in
$2.70/1M out
Speed
Very fast
Best for affordable high-volume coding support
Context
256k tokens
Ideal for teams running thousands of daily coding prompts where premium model costs add up quickly.
Coding specialistBudgetFast
Best for
Affordable high-volume coding support
View model
AnthropicBudgetFast writing

Claude 4 Haiku

Fast and affordable Anthropic option that keeps writing quality surprisingly high for the price.

Verdict
Best low-cost writing option for fast-moving content teams.
Quality score
61%
Pricing
$0.80/1M in
$4.00/1M out
Speed
Very fast
Best for fast budget writing, support automation, and cost-sensitive anthropic integrations
Context
200k tokens
Great for drafts, rewrites, and quick-turn internal workflows where Anthropic's tone quality matters.
Fast writingBudgetAnthropic
Best for
Fast budget writing, support automation, and cost-sensitive Anthropic integrations
View model
MistralBudgetBudget

Mistral Small 3.1

Mistral's ultra-budget multimodal model — exceptionally cheap with vision support, built for high-volume lightweight tasks where cost is the primary constraint.

Verdict
Ultra-cheap multimodal model for massive-volume, low-complexity pipelines.
Quality score
57%
Pricing
$0.10/1M in
$0.30/1M out
Speed
Very fast
Best for ultra-high-volume classification, summarisation, and lightweight vision tasks
Context
128k tokens
At $0.10/1M input, the cost question disappears. The only question is whether the task complexity exceeds what Mistral Small can handle.
BudgetMultimodalUltra cheapMistral
Best for
Ultra-high-volume classification, summarisation, and lightweight vision tasks
View model
OpenAIBudgetBudget

GPT-4o Mini

OpenAI's most affordable production-grade model — faster and cheaper than GPT-4o with strong enough performance for the majority of everyday tasks.

Verdict
OpenAI's fastest, cheapest option for everyday high-volume tasks.
Quality score
65%
Pricing
$0.15/1M in
$0.60/1M out
Speed
Very fast
Best for high-volume everyday tasks where gpt-4o quality is overkill
Context
128k tokens
GPT-4o Mini punches well above its price for classification, summarisation, and simple writing. It struggles when tasks get complex.
BudgetFastOpenAIHigh volume
Best for
High-volume everyday tasks where GPT-4o quality is overkill
View model
MetaBudgetLong context

Llama 4 Scout

Long-window open-weight model that handles large document sets at a low price point.

Verdict
Best open-weight long-context option for self-hosted pipelines.
Quality score
64%
Pricing
$0.50/1M in
$1.20/1M out
Speed
Fast
Best for affordable self-hosted long-context workflows and analysis pipelines
Context
512k tokens
Worth considering for internal search, analysis, and review workflows where data sovereignty matters.
Long contextCheapOpen weightsMeta
Best for
Affordable self-hosted long-context workflows and analysis pipelines
View model
AnthropicPremiumCoding

Claude Sonnet 4.6

The default model powering Cursor and Windsurf. 79.6% SWE-bench, 1M context window, and best-in-tier writing quality — all at $3/1M input.

Verdict
Best daily driver for coding and writing — the model most developers actually reach for.
Quality score
92%
Pricing
$3.00/1M in
$15.00/1M out
Speed
Balanced
Best for daily coding, writing, and long-document work at a strong price-to-quality ratio
Context
1M tokens
Powers Cursor and Windsurf by default. If your team already uses either, you're already using this model.
CodingWriting leaderCursor default1M context
Best for
Daily coding, writing, and long-document work at a strong price-to-quality ratio
View model
OpenAIPremiumAgentic

GPT-5.5

OpenAI's latest agentic flagship for coding, research, computer-use workflows, and long multi-step knowledge work.

Verdict
Best OpenAI flagship for agentic coding, research, and computer-use work.
Quality score
94%
Pricing
$5.00/1M in
$30.00/1M out
Speed
Balanced
Best for agentic coding, computer-use workflows, and complex research tasks
Context
1M tokens
Ranked from public benchmark and pricing data verified April 26, 2026: SWE-Bench Pro 58.6%, Terminal-Bench 2.0 82.7%, $5/$30 per 1M tokens, 1M API context.
AgenticCodingComputer useLong contextPremium
Best for
Agentic coding, computer-use workflows, and complex research tasks
View model
MetaBudgetOpen weights

Llama 4 Maverick

Flexible open-weight model for teams that want control, portability, and solid general-purpose performance.

Verdict
Best flexible option for teams that need open-weight portability.
Quality score
62%
Pricing
$0.60/1M in
$1.60/1M out
Speed
Fast
Best for flexible self-hosted deployments and mixed general workloads
Context
256k tokens
Strong strategic fit for teams thinking about data sovereignty or custom fine-tuning.
Open weightsSelf-hostedFlexible
Best for
Flexible self-hosted deployments and mixed general workloads
View model
DeepSeekBudgetOpen source

DeepSeek V3

Open-source frontier model from DeepSeek that matches GPT-4o class performance at a fraction of the cost — the most disruptive budget option for coding and general tasks.

Verdict
GPT-4o-class coding quality at under $0.30/1M — the best value in the directory.
Quality score
71%
Pricing
$0.27/1M in
$1.10/1M out
Speed
Fast
Best for coding, reasoning, and general tasks at extreme cost efficiency
Context
128k tokens
DeepSeek V3 shocked the market on release. At this price point with this capability level, it forces a reconsideration of when premium models are actually worth it.
Open sourceBudgetCodingDeepSeek
Best for
Coding, reasoning, and general tasks at extreme cost efficiency
View model
OpenAIBalancedBudget coding

GPT-5.2 Mini

Lower-cost OpenAI model that keeps a solid balance of usefulness, speed, and affordability for everyday tasks.

Verdict
Solid OpenAI budget option, though Gemini Flash offers better value.
Quality score
68%
Pricing
$1.20/1M in
$4.80/1M out
Speed
Fast
Best for budget technical workflows and high-volume product integrations
Context
128k tokens
Best when you specifically need an OpenAI model in your stack.
Budget codingFastOpenAI
Best for
Budget technical workflows and high-volume product integrations
View model
OpenAIBalancedImages

GPT-4o

Versatile multimodal model that handles image-related workflows and mixed-media prompts well.

Verdict
Best all-around pick for image-heavy and multimodal workflows.
Quality score
65%
Pricing
$5.00/1M in
$15.00/1M out
Speed
Fast
Best for multimodal tasks and image-adjacent workflows
Context
128k tokens
Strong when your work lives between visuals, messaging, and product context.
ImagesMultimodalCreative
Best for
Multimodal tasks and image-adjacent workflows
View model
AnthropicPremiumCoding

Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic's newest Opus flagship — 69.2% SWE-Bench Pro, 88.6% SWE-Bench Verified, 1890 Arena Elo (121 pts ahead of GPT-5.5), and native parallel subagents. Same $5/$25 price as Opus 4.7.

Verdict
Best value premium coder — frontier-grade at half of Fable 5's price.
Quality score
97%
Pricing
$5.00/1M in
$25.00/1M out
Speed
Deliberate
Best for hardest coding tasks, parallel agentic workflows, and high-fidelity vision
Context
1M tokens
Launched May 27, 2026. Available on Claude API, AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex AI, Microsoft Foundry, and GitHub Copilot. Fast mode available at $10/$50 per 1M tokens.
CodingParallel subagentsAgenticLong contextPremiumBest value premium
Best for
Hardest coding tasks, parallel agentic workflows, and high-fidelity vision
View model
AnthropicPremiumAgentic

Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic's previous Opus flagship, now superseded by Opus 4.8. Still the second-best coding model publicly available at the same $5/$25 price.

Verdict
Previous Opus flagship, now superseded by Claude Opus 4.8 at the same price.
Quality score
94%
Pricing
$5.00/1M in
$25.00/1M out
Speed
Deliberate
Best for highest-ceiling coding, agentic workflows, and deep research
Context
1M tokens
Use Opus 4.8 for all new work. Opus 4.7 remains available for pinned API integrations.
AgenticLong contextPremiumPrevious flagship
Best for
Highest-ceiling coding, agentic workflows, and deep research
View model
AnthropicPremiumCoding leader

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic's new Mythos-class flagship and the most capable coding model anyone can use — 80.3% SWE-Bench Pro, an 11-point jump over Opus 4.8. 1M context, 128K output, native parallel subagents. Released June 9, 2026.

Verdict
New global #1 — 80.3% SWE-Bench Pro, the most capable model generally available.
Quality score
98%
Pricing
$10.00/1M in
$50.00/1M out
Speed
Deliberate
Best for the hardest coding tasks, autonomous multi-step agents, and frontier-grade reasoning
Context
1M tokens
Launched June 9, 2026 as the public, Mythos-class release. Available on the Claude API, Microsoft Foundry, and Google Vertex AI. Free for all users until June 22, 2026. Same underlying model as Claude Mythos 5, with safeguards that block specific high-risk cyber responses.
Coding leaderSWE-Bench Pro #1Mythos-classParallel subagentsAgenticLong contextPremiumNew
Best for
The hardest coding tasks, autonomous multi-step agents, and frontier-grade reasoning
View model
AnthropicPremiumFrontier

Claude Mythos 5

Anthropic's most powerful frontier model — the same underlying model as Fable 5 with safeguards lifted in some areas, restricted to vetted enterprise and research partners. The capability ceiling of mid-2026.

Verdict
The frontier ceiling — same model as Fable 5, safeguards lifted, partner-only.
Quality score
98%
Pricing
$10.00/1M in
$50.00/1M out
Speed
Deliberate
Best for frontier cybersecurity research, autonomous vulnerability discovery, and the absolute capability ceiling
Context
1M tokens
Launched June 9, 2026 alongside Fable 5, following the April Project Glasswing private preview on Google Cloud. Restricted to vetted enterprise and research partners due to advanced cybersecurity capabilities. Same underlying model and benchmarks as Claude Fable 5.
FrontierRestricted accessCybersecuritySWE-Bench Pro #1Mythos-classPremiumNew
Best for
Frontier cybersecurity research, autonomous vulnerability discovery, and the absolute capability ceiling
View model
OpenAIPremiumAgentic

GPT-5.4

OpenAI's latest flagship with unique desktop-control capabilities — it can see your screen, click, and navigate apps via the API.

Verdict
Best for agentic automation and desktop control workflows.
Quality score
86%
Pricing
$2.50/1M in
$15.00/1M out
Speed
Balanced
Best for agentic workflows, desktop automation, and complex multi-step reasoning
Context
272k tokens
Unique value is the computer-use capability. If you're building agents that operate software, nothing else compares right now.
AgenticDesktop controlReasoningPremium
Best for
Agentic workflows, desktop automation, and complex multi-step reasoning
View model
AnthropicPremiumCoding leader

Claude Opus 4.6

Anthropic's previous Opus flagship for high-stakes coding, reasoning, and deep research before Opus 4.7.

Verdict
Previous Opus flagship, now superseded by Claude Opus 4.7.
Quality score
92%
Pricing
$15.00/1M in
$75.00/1M out
Speed
Deliberate
Best for agentic coding, complex multi-step reasoning, and deep research
Context
1M tokens
Keep for legacy comparisons and pinned integrations. New premium coding workflows should evaluate Opus 4.7 first.
Coding leaderSWE-bench #1AgenticPremium
Best for
Agentic coding, complex multi-step reasoning, and deep research
View model
MistralBalancedEU hosting

Mistral Large 2

Balanced enterprise model with consistent reasoning, good speed, and a dependable middle-ground — especially for European teams with data residency requirements.

Verdict
Best balanced generalist for EU teams with data residency needs.
Quality score
67%
Pricing
$3.00/1M in
$9.00/1M out
Speed
Balanced
Best for balanced team usage with eu data residency requirements
Context
128k tokens
The EU hosting angle is the real differentiator here — for teams outside Europe, other models perform better.
EU hostingBalancedTeam default
Best for
Balanced team usage with EU data residency requirements
View model
OpenAIPremiumFormer top pick

GPT-5.2

Reliable OpenAI flagship for serious coding and product work — a strong default before GPT-5.4 was released.

Verdict
Capable but outclassed — GPT-5.4 is now cheaper and better.
Quality score
81%
Pricing
$12.00/1M in
$38.00/1M out
Speed
Balanced
Best for serious coding and complex product work
Context
200k tokens
Worth considering only if you have existing integrations built around this model.
Former top pickCodingReasoningPremium
Best for
Serious coding and complex product work
View model
DeepSeekBudgetReasoning

DeepSeek R1

Open-source reasoning model that matches o1-class performance on math, science, and complex coding at a fraction of the cost — the best open alternative to proprietary reasoning models.

Verdict
Open-source o1-class reasoning at a fraction of the cost.
Quality score
68%
Pricing
$0.55/1M in
$2.19/1M out
Speed
Deliberate
Best for math, science, complex reasoning, and multi-step problem solving at budget cost
Context
128k tokens
R1 is a genuine milestone for open-source AI. The reasoning quality is real — the tradeoff is latency, not capability.
ReasoningOpen sourceBudgetDeepSeek
Best for
Math, science, complex reasoning, and multi-step problem solving at budget cost
View model

How we score models

Every recommendation is built on 6 criteria. Click to see exactly what we look at.

Next comparisons worth reading

Compare pricingWhich AI should I use?Best AI for codingGPT vs Claude vs Gemini

FAQ

Which AI model should I start with?

Start with Claude Fable 5 for the best daily-driver default. Use Mistral Small 3.1 if cost is the priority. Use Grok 4 if you need the strongest coding performance.

Which AI model is cheapest?

Mistral Small 3.1 is the best cheap default balancing cost, usefulness, and context window. Grok 4 is the cheapest coding specialist.

Which AI model is best for coding?

Grok 4 is the strongest budget coding option in the directory. Claude Fable 5 is the practical all-around default that also excels at coding tasks.

How should I compare models?

Start with your main use case, then compare price, speed, and context window. The best model changes quickly when one of those priorities matters more than the others.