Best premium model for coding agents and high-stakes engineering work.
64.3% on SWE-Bench Pro, ahead of GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.4 in current public comparisons
1M context window for large codebases and document-heavy workflows
Strong vision and agentic consistency improvements over Opus 4.6
Premium pricing is expensive for high-volume workloads
GPT-5.5 has stronger OpenAI ecosystem fit and faster Codex availability for some teams
What people actually use Claude Opus 4.7 for.
Delegating difficult multi-file engineering work that needs careful verification
Running premium coding agents and autonomous PR review workflows
Reading large codebases, research corpora, or design references with 1M context
See what Claude Opus 4.7 actually costs at your usage level
Based on Claude Opus 4.7 API pricing: $5/1M input · $25/1M output. Real costs vary by provider discounts and caching. Check the provider for exact current rates.
Price History
→0% since May 8
32 data points · tracked daily since May 8, 2026
Highest-ceiling coding, agentic workflows, and deep research. Start free — no card required.
Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.
Similar models worth checking before you commit.
Anthropic's newest Opus flagship — 69.2% SWE-Bench Pro, 88.6% SWE-Bench Verified, 1890 Arena Elo (121 pts ahead of GPT-5.5), and native parallel subagents. Same $5/$25 price as Opus 4.7.
Pricing moves, ranking shifts, and capability updates.
Claude Opus 4.7 now leads premium coding recommendations because it has the strongest current public SWE-Bench Pro score among generally available models.
View modelClaude Opus 4.7 is best for highest-ceiling coding, agentic workflows, and deep research. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around premium pricing and deliberate speed.
You need cheaper high-volume throughput, image generation, or a workflow that must stay inside OpenAI tooling.
Meta: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is the lower-cost option to compare first when you want a similar workflow fit with less token spend.
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the better pick when response time matters more than maximum depth or premium quality.
Newsletter
We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.
No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.
Highest-ceiling coding, agentic workflows, and deep research
You need cheaper high-volume throughput, image generation, or a workflow that must stay inside OpenAI tooling.
Ranked from public benchmark and pricing data verified April 26, 2026: SWE-Bench Pro 64.3%, 1M context, $5/$25 per 1M tokens.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is Anthropic's mid-cycle flagship model, balancing strong reasoning, coding, and instruction-following with a 200K context window. It sits between Haiku and Opus in Anthropic's lineup, offering near-flagship quality at a lower cost than top-tier models.
Claude Opus 4 is Anthropic's most capable flagship model, designed for complex reasoning, nuanced writing, and sophisticated multi-step tasks. It sits at the top of the Claude 4 family, prioritizing depth and quality over speed.
No reviews yet — be the first.
