Best premium model for coding agents and high-stakes engineering work.
100
Coding
95
Writing
97
Research
82
Images
24
Value
96
Long Context
Use this when
Highest-ceiling coding, agentic workflows, and deep research
Skip this if
Strengths
64.3% on SWE-Bench Pro, ahead of GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.4 in current public comparisons
1M context window for large codebases and document-heavy workflows
Strong vision and agentic consistency improvements over Opus 4.6
Weaknesses
Premium pricing is expensive for high-volume workloads
GPT-5.5 has stronger OpenAI ecosystem fit and faster Codex availability for some teams
Monthly cost estimate
See what Claude Opus 4.7 actually costs at your usage level
Input tokens / month1M
10k50M
Output tokens / month500k
10k25M
Input cost
$5.00
Output cost
$12.50
Total / month
$17.50
Based on Claude Opus 4.7 API pricing: $5/1M input · $25/1M output. Real costs vary by provider discounts and caching. Check the provider for exact current rates.
Price History
Claude Opus 4.7 pricing over time
Tracking since Apr 26, 2026 · more data builds daily
1 data point · tracked daily since Apr 26, 2026
Ready to try it?
Start using Claude Opus 4.7
Highest-ceiling coding, agentic workflows, and deep research. Start free — no card required.
Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.
Compare alternatives
Similar models worth checking before you commit.
AnthropicPremium
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is Anthropic's mid-cycle flagship model, balancing strong reasoning, coding, and instruction-following with a 200K context window. It sits between Haiku and Opus in Anthropic's lineup, offering near-flagship quality at a lower cost than top-tier models.
Verdict
One of the best models for coding and complex instruction-following, but its premium pricing demands premium use cases.
Pricing moves, ranking shifts, and capability updates.
RecommendationApr 26, 2026
Claude Opus 4.7 moved into premium coding recommendations
Claude Opus 4.7 now leads premium coding recommendations because it has the strongest current public SWE-Bench Pro score among generally available models.
Claude Opus 4.7 is best for highest-ceiling coding, agentic workflows, and deep research. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around premium pricing and deliberate speed.
When should I avoid Claude Opus 4.7?
You need cheaper high-volume throughput, image generation, or a workflow that must stay inside OpenAI tooling.
What is a cheaper alternative to Claude Opus 4.7?
Mistral: Mistral Nemo is the lower-cost option to compare first when you want a similar workflow fit with less token spend.
What is a faster alternative to Claude Opus 4.7?
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the better pick when response time matters more than maximum depth or premium quality.
Newsletter
Get notified when Claude Opus 4.7 pricing changes
We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.
No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.
You need cheaper high-volume throughput, image generation, or a workflow that must stay inside OpenAI tooling.
Best for complex coding tasks, multi-step reasoning, and long-document analysis where gpt-4o-class quality is needed without paying for the absolute top tier.
Context
200k tokens
Pricing at $6 input / $30 output per million tokens is significantly higher than GPT-4o ($2.50/$10). Best accessed via Anthropic API or Amazon Bedrock. Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024 version) supersedes the June 2024 release with improved performance.
Claude Opus 4 is Anthropic's most capable flagship model, designed for complex reasoning, nuanced writing, and sophisticated multi-step tasks. It sits at the top of the Claude 4 family, prioritizing depth and quality over speed.
Verdict
Anthropic's best model for when quality matters more than speed or cost.
Quality score
84%
Pricing
$30.00/1M in
$150.00/1M out
Speed
Deliberate
Best for demanding professional tasks requiring deep reasoning, nuanced judgment, and high-quality long-form output.
Context
200k tokens
At $15 input / $75 output per 1M tokens, Opus 4 is one of the most expensive models available. Anthropic recommends using Claude Sonnet 4 for most production use cases and reserving Opus 4 for tasks explicitly requiring maximum capability.
FlagshipPremiumReasoningLong ContextAgentic
Best for
Demanding professional tasks requiring deep reasoning, nuanced judgment, and high-quality long-form output.
Claude Opus 4.1 is Anthropic's top-tier flagship model, designed for the most demanding tasks requiring deep reasoning, nuanced writing, and complex multi-step analysis. It sits at the apex of the Claude 4 family, prioritizing capability over cost and speed.
Verdict
Anthropic's most capable model for demanding professional work, but its steep output cost demands justification.
Quality score
83%
Pricing
$15.00/1M in
$75.00/1M out
Speed
Deliberate
Best for high-stakes professional work where output quality justifies premium pricing — legal analysis, advanced research synthesis, and complex agentic workflows.
Context
200k tokens
Output pricing at $75/1M tokens is among the highest in the market — nearly 3x GPT-4.1's output cost. Batch API discounts may be available through Anthropic. Context window is 200K but very long prompts at Opus pricing can become extremely expensive quickly. Note: supersedes field lists Claude 4 Haiku, which is likely a data error — Opus 4.1 more logically succeeds Claude Opus 4.
FlagshipPremiumReasoningLong ContextAgentic
Best for
High-stakes professional work where output quality justifies premium pricing — legal analysis, advanced research synthesis, and complex agentic workflows.
