UseRightAI
UseRightAI logo
HomeModelsAsk AIComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAI
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.
UseRightAI logo
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTBuild your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

UPDATED 2026-05-2611 PUBLIC RELEASES YTDSCORED ON 5 BENCHMARKS0 PAID RANKINGS

11 new flagship models.
One year-defining release.

Every major model that shipped in 2026 — ranked, benchmarked, and dated. Scrub the timeline to see how the field reshaped itself month by month.

The 2026 release timeline.

JAN 01 ─── DEC 31
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
Claude Haiku 4.5
DeepSeek V4
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Maverick
Grok 4
Gemini 3.1 Pro
GPT-5.4
Claude Opus 4.7
GPT-5.5
Mistral Medium 3.1
Claude Opus 4.8
2026-04-1641 DAYS AGO
Claude Opus 4.7
ANTHROPIC · PREMIUM
Was #1 on SWE-Bench Pro at 64.3% — now superseded by Opus 4.8 (69.2%) at the same price. Vision accuracy 98.5%, strong agentic recall. Still fully supported.
SWE-BENCH
64.3
CONTEXT
1M
$/M IN
$5
READ FULL REPORT →
01 / 06

The three picks that shaped the year.

EDITOR'S VERDICT
BEST OVERALL · 2026
Claude Opus 4.7
ANTHROPIC · PREMIUM

Top of SWE-Bench Pro. Vision accuracy 98.5%. The default for high-stakes engineering and reasoning.

RELEASED
04-16
$/M IN
$5
CONTEXT
1M
BEST VALUE
Grok 4
XAI · BALANCED

2M context, $2/M input, strong coding. The best ratio on the chart by a clear margin.

RELEASED
02-18
$/M IN
$2
CONTEXT
2M
BEST OPEN-WEIGHTS
Llama 4 Maverick
META · BUDGET

Frontier-adjacent quality, self-hostable, no API costs. The release that mattered most for builders.

RELEASED
02-04
$/M IN
$0.6
CONTEXT
256K
02 / 06

Benchmark battle. Pick the lens.

5 BENCHMARKS · 11 MODELS
01Claude Opus 4.8
69.2$5/M
02Claude Opus 4.7
64.3$5/M
03GPT-5.5
60.1$5/M
04GPT-5.4
57.7$2.5/M
05Grok 4
56.0$2/M
06Gemini 3.1 Pro
53.2$1.25/M
07DeepSeek V4
52.8$0.27/M
08Mistral Medium 3.1
49.0$1/M
09Llama 4 Maverick
47.2$0.6/M
10Llama 4 Scout
41.0$0.3/M
11Claude Haiku 4.5
28.4$0.8/M
03 / 06

Quality per dollar. The full chart.

SCATTER · 11 MODELS
Claude Haiku 4.5
DeepSeek V4
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Maverick
Grok 4
Gemini 3.1 Pro
GPT-5.4
Claude Opus 4.7
GPT-5.5
Mistral Medium 3.1
Claude Opus 4.8
$/M INPUT →

The Pareto frontier of 2026.

Each dot is one model. Up means better quality, right means more expensive. The top-left edge is the Pareto frontier — every dot under it is strictly dominated.

ON THE FRONTIER
Claude Opus 4.7 (top quality) · Grok 4 (best value) · Llama 4 Maverick (best free option) · Haiku 4.5 (cheapest serious model)
04 / 06

Who shipped what. Year-to-date.

7 PROVIDERS · 11 RELEASES
Anthropic
3
RELEASES · YTD
OpenAI
2
RELEASES · YTD
Meta
2
RELEASES · YTD
Google
1
RELEASES · YTD
xAI
1
RELEASES · YTD
DeepSeek
1
RELEASES · YTD
Mistral
1
RELEASES · YTD
05 / 06

Every release. One card each.

12 CARDS · NEWEST FIRST
MODEL OF THE YEAR
2026-05-270D AGO · RELEASE
Claude Opus 4.8
ANTHROPICPREMIUM

New #1 on every coding benchmark. 69.2% SWE-Bench Pro, 1890 Elo (121 pts ahead of GPT-5.5), native parallel subagents — same $5/$25 price as Opus 4.7.

SWE
69
TERM
83
MMLU
93
VIS
99
MATH
96
Input cost$5.00/M
Output cost$25.00/M
Context1M
+ PROS
  • +69.2% SWE-Bench Pro — new frontier
  • +1890 Arena Elo (67% win rate vs GPT-5.5)
  • +Native parallel subagents built in
– CONS
  • –Deliberate speed — not for latency-sensitive apps
  • –Same price tier as 4.7, not budget-friendly
VIEW FULL REPORT →
2026-05-1214D AGO · RELEASE
Mistral Medium 3.1
MISTRALBALANCED

Europe's strongest open release of 2026. A clean middle option for teams that need a non-US model.

SWE
49
TERM
62
MMLU
86
VIS
74
MATH
82
Input cost$1.00/M
Output cost$4.50/M
Context256K
+ PROS
  • +EU-hosted option
  • +Apache 2.0 license
  • +Good speed
– CONS
  • –Below frontier on coding
  • –Smaller ecosystem
VIEW FULL REPORT →
2026-04-3026D AGO · RELEASE
GPT-5.5
OPENAIPREMIUM

Best for agentic, computer-use, and Codex workflows. The right pick if your stack is already OpenAI-native.

SWE
60
TERM
83
MMLU
91
VIS
86
MATH
93
Input cost$5.00/M
Output cost$25.00/M
Context1M
+ PROS
  • +Top Terminal-Bench at 82.7%
  • +Best computer-use ability
  • +1M context
– CONS
  • –Vision lags Opus 4.7
  • –More expensive than 5.4 for marginal gains
VIEW FULL REPORT →
2026-04-1641D AGO · RELEASE
Claude Opus 4.7
ANTHROPICPREMIUM

Was #1 on SWE-Bench Pro at 64.3% — now superseded by Opus 4.8 (69.2%) at the same price. Vision accuracy 98.5%, strong agentic recall. Still fully supported.

SWE
64
TERM
78
MMLU
92
VIS
99
MATH
94
Input cost$5.00/M
Output cost$25.00/M
Context1M
+ PROS
  • +SWE-Bench Pro 64.3% — still top-tier
  • +Vision accuracy 98.5%
  • +1M context with sharp recall
– CONS
  • –Opus 4.8 is strictly better at the same price
  • –New tokenizer can raise effective cost by 35%
VIEW FULL REPORT →
2026-04-1145D AGO · DISCLOSED
Claude Mythos
ANTHROPICINTERNALNOT AVAILABLE

Anthropic's most powerful internal model. Found thousands of zero-days autonomously. Not released publicly.

SWE
87
TERM
93
MMLU
96
VIS
99
MATH
98
Input cost—
Output cost—
Context—
+ PROS
  • +Frontier of frontier
  • +Autonomous capabilities reported
– CONS
  • –Not available — disclosed only
VIEW FULL REPORT →
2026-03-2265D AGO · RELEASE
GPT-5.4
OPENAIPREMIUM

OpenAI's best price/quality. Pair with Claude Opus for hybrid stacks — they're complementary, not competitive.

SWE
58
TERM
80
MMLU
90
VIS
84
MATH
92
Input cost$2.50/M
Output cost$15.00/M
Context272K
+ PROS
  • +7× cheaper than Opus 4.7
  • +Top-tier reasoning
  • +Mature tools/agents
– CONS
  • –Context capped at 272K
  • –Vision lags Gemini
VIEW FULL REPORT →
2026-03-0483D AGO · RELEASE
Gemini 3.1 Pro
GOOGLEPREMIUM

Research workhorse. 2M context, native multimodality, and the best-priced premium model in the directory.

SWE
53
TERM
67
MMLU
90
VIS
90
MATH
90
Input cost$1.25/M
Output cost$10.00/M
Context2M
+ PROS
  • +2M context
  • +Best research score
  • +Best price-per-quality at premium tier
– CONS
  • –Lags top tier on raw coding
  • –Stuck inside Google's tooling
VIEW FULL REPORT →
2026-02-1897D AGO · RELEASE
Grok 4
XAIBALANCED

Strong coding value at 2M context. Underrated at this price tier. The contrarian voice helps in research.

SWE
56
TERM
70
MMLU
86
VIS
72
MATH
87
Input cost$2.00/M
Output cost$10.00/M
Context2M
+ PROS
  • +2M context at $2/M input
  • +Strong reasoning
  • +Real-time X data integration
– CONS
  • –Writing voice is uneven
  • –Smaller ecosystem
VIEW FULL REPORT →
2026-02-04111D AGO · RELEASE
Llama 4 Scout
METABUDGET

10M context is the headline. Useful for indexing entire codebases but accuracy degrades past 1M.

SWE
41
TERM
56
MMLU
82
VIS
70
MATH
78
Input cost$0.30/M
Output cost$1.20/M
Context10M
+ PROS
  • +10M context window — by far the largest
  • +Open weights
  • +Cheap
– CONS
  • –Long-context accuracy thins out past 1M
  • –Below frontier on reasoning
VIEW FULL REPORT →
2026-02-04111D AGO · RELEASE
Llama 4 Maverick
METABUDGET

Biggest open-weight leap of 2026. Competitive with GPT-5.4 on general tasks at a quarter of the price.

SWE
47
TERM
60
MMLU
85
VIS
76
MATH
84
Input cost$0.60/M
Output cost$2.40/M
Context256K
+ PROS
  • +Open weights at near-frontier quality
  • +Fast
  • +Strong math
– CONS
  • –256K context lags Scout
  • –No native multimodality
VIEW FULL REPORT →
2026-01-22124D AGO · RELEASE
DeepSeek V4
DEEPSEEKOPEN-WEIGHTS

Open-weights, $0.27/M input, beats GPT-4o on coding. Quietly the most disruptive release of January.

SWE
53
TERM
64
MMLU
84
VIS
60
MATH
88
Input cost$0.27/M
Output cost$1.10/M
Context128K
+ PROS
  • +Cheapest serious code model
  • +Open weights — self-hostable
  • +Strong math
– CONS
  • –Data residency questions for some teams
  • –Vision is weak
VIEW FULL REPORT →
2026-01-08138D AGO · RELEASE
Claude Haiku 4.5
ANTHROPICBUDGET

Fast, cheap, surprisingly capable. The cheapest model in the lineup that you can actually ship behind a feature flag.

SWE
28
TERM
41
MMLU
79
VIS
68
MATH
72
Input cost$0.80/M
Output cost$4.00/M
Context200K
+ PROS
  • +96-score speed — fastest in directory
  • +Cheapest serious model at $0.80/M input
  • +Vision matches mid-tier from 2025
– CONS
  • –SWE-Bench Pro under 30%
  • –Context capped at 200K
VIEW FULL REPORT →
FAQ / END

Frequently actually asked.

5 ENTRIES
+

Keep going. More guides.

RELATED
DIRECTORY
All AI models

Every model currently tracked, with live pricing.

COMPARE
GPT-5.5 vs Opus 4.7

Head-to-head on coding, vision, agentic, and price.

GUIDE
Best AI for coding

The 2026 winner by use case and budget.

PRICING
Price history

Track every API price move since launch.

DATA
Benchmark scores

Raw numbers across every benchmark we cite.

GUIDE
Best cheap AI

Free + $20 chatbots ranked by Value Index.