UseRightAI
UseRightAI logo
HomeModelsAsk AIComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAI
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.
UseRightAI logo
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTBuild your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

Home/Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-4o
Winner: Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic vs OpenAI

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-4o

Claude Opus 4.7 wins on coding (96 vs 58) and writing quality and context window (1M vs 128K). For most workflows, Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger default — previous opus flagship, now superseded by claude opus 4.8 at the same price.

Last verified May 27, 2026/Model data modified May 27, 2026
Rankings refresh dailyScored on 6 criteriaNo paid rankings
AnthropicPremium
Input cost
$5.00/1M
Context
1M tokens
Speed
Deliberate

Clear recommendation block

The shortest way to see the safest default, the lower-cost option, and the specialist pick before you read deeper.

Best overall model

Claude Opus 4.7

View
Why this recommendation

Claude Opus 4.7 is the safest overall answer here when you want the strongest default instead of the lowest list price.

AnthropicPremium
Best for
Highest-ceiling coding, agentic workflows, and deep research
Price
$5.00/1M
Context
1M tokens
Best budget model

Grok 4

View
Why this recommendation

Grok 4 is the lower-cost option to start with when you still need useful output at scale.

xAIBalanced
Best for
Coding and research at competitive pricing with maximum context
Price
$2.00/1M
Context
2M tokens
Best for speed

GPT-4o

View
Why this recommendation

GPT-4o is the better pick when response speed matters more than maximum reasoning depth.

OpenAIBalanced
Best for
Multimodal tasks and image-adjacent workflows
Price
$5.00/1M
Context
128k tokens

Why this page recommends it

Claude Opus 4.7 leads on coding with a score of 96 vs 58 for GPT-4o.

Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger context window: 1M vs 128K for GPT-4o.

Both models are similarly priced — the decision comes down to capability, not cost.

Decision notes

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 for coding and research — highest-ceiling coding.

Choose GPT-4o when multimodal tasks and image-adjacent workflows.

Both models serve different primary workflows — consider using each where it has a clear edge.

Interactive decision lab

Test the recommendation against your priority

Switch the scoring lens to see whether the top answer changes when you care more about cost, speed, or long-document work.

#1Claude Opus 4.787 pts
#2GPT-4o62 pts
Quality first

Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic / Premium / May 27, 2026

87

Previous Opus flagship, now superseded by Claude Opus 4.8 at the same price.

Ranks models by the broadest mix of coding, writing, research, and long-context usefulness.

Cost
$5.00/1M
$25.00/1M out
Speed
Deliberate
2/100 score
Context
1M tokens
input window
View model
Data-backed recommendation
Avoid this pick if

You are starting a new integration — Opus 4.8 is strictly better at the same price.

Recommended comparisons

The fastest way to see where the recommendation shifts when your priority changes.

AnthropicPremiumWinner: Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7

Previous Opus flagship, now superseded by Claude Opus 4.8 at the same price.

Best use case
Highest-ceiling coding, agentic workflows, and deep research
Input
$5.00/1M
Pricing
Premium
Speed
Deliberate
Context
1M tokens
AgenticLong contextPremium
OpenAIBalancedOption 2

GPT-4o

Best all-around pick for image-heavy and multimodal workflows.

Best use case
Multimodal tasks and image-adjacent workflows
Input
$5.00/1M
Pricing
Balanced
Speed
Fast
Context
128k tokens
ImagesMultimodalCreative

Pros

64.3% SWE-Bench Pro — still strong, second only to Opus 4.8

1M context window for large codebases and document-heavy workflows

Strong vision accuracy at 98.5% on Vision Bench

Cons

Opus 4.8 launched at the same $5/$25 price with 69.2% SWE-Bench Pro and parallel subagents

No reason to prefer Opus 4.7 for new integrations — use Opus 4.8 instead

Explore related decisions

Browse all modelsCompare pricingView Claude Opus 4.7View GPT-4oClaude Opus 4 7GPT 4OBest AI for codingBest AI for writingBest AI for researchCompare models side by side

How we evaluate AI models

UseRightAI recommendations are based on practical decision factors people actually feel in day-to-day use.

Newsletter

Get updates when claude opus 4.7 vs gpt-4o changes

Useful if you care about ranking shifts, pricing changes, or a better recommendation appearing in this decision path.

No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than GPT-4o?

Claude Opus 4.7 wins on more categories — coding, research, long context. GPT-4o is the better pick when multimodal tasks and image-adjacent workflows. The right choice depends on your specific use case.

Which is cheaper — Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-4o?

Both models are similarly priced at $5/1M input tokens. The decision should come down to capability, not cost.

Which has a larger context window — Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-4o?

Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger context window at 1M tokens vs GPT-4o's 128K. For large document analysis, Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger pick.

Is Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-4o better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 is better for coding with a score of 96 vs GPT-4o's 58. For the highest coding quality available, Claude Sonnet 4.6 (79.6% SWE-bench) or Opus 4.6 (80.8%) remain benchmarks.

Which is faster — Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-4o?

GPT-4o is faster with a fast speed rating (score: 4) vs Claude Opus 4.7's deliberate rating (score: 2).