UseRightAI
UseRightAI logo
HomeModelsComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAI
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.
UseRightAI logo
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTBuild your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

HomeModelsGoogle: Gemma 2 27B
GoogleBalanced

Google: Gemma 2 27B

A strong open-weight performer for short-context coding and reasoning, hobbled by an outdated 8K context limit.

74
Coding
70
Writing
62
Research
0
Images
65
Value
18
Long Context
Use this when

Teams that need strong open-weight model performance for coding and reasoning tasks without paying flagship prices.

Skip this if

You need long document processing, multimodal inputs, or frontier-level reasoning — the 8K context window alone disqualifies it for most RAG or document analysis workflows.

Pricing
$0.65/1M in
$0.65/1M out
→0%since Mar 2026
Context
8k tokens
Speed
Fast
How to access
API
$0.65/1M input tokens
Subscription = chat interface. API = build with it. Compare all subscription plans
Switch to instead if...
Best overall
Claude Opus 4.6
Cheaper option
Meta: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Faster option
Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Strengths

Exceptionally strong for its parameter count — outperforms many larger open models on benchmarks like MMLU and HumanEval

Competitive instruction-following that rivals Claude Haiku and GPT-4o Mini on structured tasks

Clean, well-formatted outputs with low hallucination rates compared to similarly-sized open models

Cost-effective at $0.65/1M tokens for both input and output — symmetric pricing simplifies budgeting

Weaknesses

Tiny 8K context window is a serious limitation — Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude Sonnet 4.6 offer 200K+ tokens

No multimodal capabilities; text-only limits applicability in modern pipelines

Reasoning depth falls short of frontier models like GPT-5.4 or Gemini 3.1 Pro on complex multi-step problems

Monthly cost estimate

See what Google: Gemma 2 27B actually costs at your usage level

Input tokens / month1M
10k50M
Output tokens / month500k
10k25M
Input cost
$0.650
Output cost
$0.325
Total / month
$0.975

Based on Google: Gemma 2 27B API pricing: $0.65/1M input · $0.65/1M output. Real costs vary by provider discounts and caching. Check the provider for exact current rates.

Price History

Google: Gemma 2 27B pricing over time

→0% since Mar 27

$0.702$0.676$0.650$0.624$0.598Mar 27Mar 28

2 data points · tracked daily since Mar 27, 2026

Ready to try it?

Start using Google: Gemma 2 27B

Teams that need strong open-weight model performance for coding and reasoning tasks without paying flagship prices.. Start free — no card required.

Try Google: Gemma 2 27B freeCompare alternatives

Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.

Compare alternatives

Similar models worth checking before you commit.

GoogleBalanced

Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is Google's most capable reasoning-focused model, featuring a massive 1M token context window and strong performance across code, math, and complex analysis tasks. It represents Google's top-tier offering in the Gemini 2.5 generation, optimized for depth over speed.

Verdict
Google's most capable model — a top-tier reasoning and coding powerhouse with an unmatched context window, held back only by its preview status and output cost.
Quality score
83%
Pricing
$1.25/1M in
$10.00/1M out
Speed
Deliberate
Best for complex multi-step reasoning, large codebase analysis, and tasks requiring deep synthesis across very long documents.
Context
1.0M tokens
This is a preview model (06-05 date suffix indicates a versioned snapshot); Google may deprecate or modify it before a stable GA release. Pricing tiers differ based on prompt length — prompts over 200K tokens are charged at $2.50/1M input and $15/1M output, significantly increasing cost for very long-context use cases.
FlagshipLong ContextReasoningCodingPreview
Best for
Complex multi-step reasoning, large codebase analysis, and tasks requiring deep synthesis across very long documents.
View model
AnthropicPremium

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is Anthropic's mid-cycle flagship model, balancing strong reasoning, coding, and instruction-following with a 200K context window. It sits between Haiku and Opus in Anthropic's lineup, offering near-flagship quality at a lower cost than top-tier models.

Verdict
One of the best models for coding and complex instruction-following, but its premium pricing demands premium use cases.
Quality score
81%
Pricing
$6.00/1M in
$30.00/1M out
Speed
Balanced
Best for complex coding tasks, multi-step reasoning, and long-document analysis where gpt-4o-class quality is needed without paying for the absolute top tier.
Context
200k tokens
Pricing at $6 input / $30 output per million tokens is significantly higher than GPT-4o ($2.50/$10). Best accessed via Anthropic API or Amazon Bedrock. Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024 version) supersedes the June 2024 release with improved performance.
CodingLong ContextInstruction FollowingReasoningPremium
Best for
Complex coding tasks, multi-step reasoning, and long-document analysis where GPT-4o-class quality is needed without paying for the absolute top tier.
View model
AnthropicPremium

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4 is Anthropic's most capable flagship model, designed for complex reasoning, nuanced writing, and sophisticated multi-step tasks. It sits at the top of the Claude 4 family, prioritizing depth and quality over speed.

Verdict
Anthropic's best model for when quality matters more than speed or cost.
Quality score
84%
Pricing
$15.00/1M in
$75.00/1M out
Speed
Deliberate
Best for demanding professional tasks requiring deep reasoning, nuanced judgment, and high-quality long-form output.
Context
200k tokens
At $15 input / $75 output per 1M tokens, Opus 4 is one of the most expensive models available. Anthropic recommends using Claude Sonnet 4 for most production use cases and reserving Opus 4 for tasks explicitly requiring maximum capability.
FlagshipPremiumReasoningLong ContextAgentic
Best for
Demanding professional tasks requiring deep reasoning, nuanced judgment, and high-quality long-form output.
View model

Change history

Pricing moves, ranking shifts, and capability updates.

New ModelMar 27, 2026

Google: Gemma 2 27B — added to UseRightAI

Google: Gemma 2 27B (Google) is now indexed. A strong open-weight performer for short-context coding and reasoning, hobbled by an outdated 8K context limit.

View model

FAQ

What is Google: Gemma 2 27B best for?

Google: Gemma 2 27B is best for teams that need strong open-weight model performance for coding and reasoning tasks without paying flagship prices.. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around balanced pricing and fast speed.

When should I avoid Google: Gemma 2 27B?

You need long document processing, multimodal inputs, or frontier-level reasoning — the 8K context window alone disqualifies it for most RAG or document analysis workflows.

What is a cheaper alternative to Google: Gemma 2 27B?

Meta: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is the lower-cost option to compare first when you want a similar workflow fit with less token spend.

What is a faster alternative to Google: Gemma 2 27B?

Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is the better pick when response time matters more than maximum depth or premium quality.

Newsletter

Get notified when Google: Gemma 2 27B pricing changes

We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.

No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.