Gemma 2 9B
Gemma 2 9B is Google's open-weight 9-billion parameter model designed for efficient on-device and API deployment. It punches above its weight class for instruction-following and general language tasks at an exceptionally low cost.
Best cheap AI for broad day-to-day work — now with 1M context.
High-volume everyday AI usage where speed and cost both matter
You need premium reasoning depth or the highest coding benchmark scores.
The default budget pick for startups watching cost. The 1M context at this price is unmatched.
1M token context window at $0.50/$3 per million tokens
2.5× faster time-to-first-token than Gemini 2.5 Flash
Strong multimodal support across text, images, audio, and video
Not as sharp as premium models on hard reasoning or complex coding
May need more validation on nuanced technical tasks
What people actually use Gemini 3.1 Flash for.
High-volume customer support automation across thousands of daily tickets
Fast content generation for marketing pipelines — drafts, rewrites, translations
Rapid document summarization and classification in processing pipelines
The nearest models people weigh against it, and what actually separates them.
vs Gemma 2 9B — Against Gemma 2 9B (Google), Gemini 3.1 Flash costs about 97% more per token and takes 122.1x the context. Gemma 2 9B is the one to check first if the price difference matters more than the ceiling.
vs Gemma 4 26B A4B — Against Gemma 4 26B A4B (Google), Gemini 3.1 Flash costs about 85% more per token, takes 3.8x the context and answers faster. Gemma 4 26B A4B is the one to check first if the price difference matters more than the ceiling.
vs Gemma 4 31B — Against Gemma 4 31B (Google), Gemini 3.1 Flash costs about 61% more per token, takes 3.8x the context and answers faster. Gemma 4 31B is the one to check first if the price difference matters more than the ceiling.
Price History
→0% since May 8
71 data points · tracked daily since May 8, 2026
High-volume everyday AI usage where speed and cost both matter. Start free — no card required.
Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.
Similar models worth checking before you commit.
Gemma 2 9B is Google's open-weight 9-billion parameter model designed for efficient on-device and API deployment. It punches above its weight class for instruction-following and general language tasks at an exceptionally low cost.
Gemma 4 26B A4B is a sparse mixture-of-experts open model from Google, activating only ~4B parameters per forward pass despite having 26B total parameters. It offers a 262K context window at budget pricing, making it one of the more capable open-weight models for its cost tier.
Gemma 4 31B is Google's open-weight instruction-tuned model offering a strong balance of capability and cost efficiency at just $0.14/$0.40 per million tokens. It features a 262K context window and is designed for developers who need capable on-premise or API-hosted inference without flagship pricing.
Gemini 3.1 Flash costs $0.5 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens on the API. A month of 10M input and 2M output tokens runs about $11.00 at list price, before any batch or caching discounts.
Gemini 3.1 Flash is best for high-volume everyday ai usage where speed and cost both matter. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around budget pricing and very fast speed.
You need premium reasoning depth or the highest coding benchmark scores.
Gemma 2 9B (Google) at $0.03/1M/1M input against Gemini 3.1 Flash's $0.50/1M/1M — roughly 97% less per token all in. A capable open-weight budget model hamstrung by a frustratingly small context window. Compare it first if Gemini 3.1 Flash's pricing is the thing stopping you.
Gemma 4 26B A4B — fast against Gemini 3.1 Flash's very fast, with 262k tokens of context. Worth the swap when response time is what your users notice rather than the last few points of reasoning depth.
Newsletter
We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.
No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.
No reviews yet — be the first.