A once-useful workhorse now completely overshadowed by cheaper, more capable successors.
42
Coding
48
Writing
30
Research
0
Images
62
Value
5
Long Context
Use this when
High-volume, cost-sensitive text tasks like classification, summarization, and simple Q&A where bleeding-edge quality is not required.
Skip this if
You need to process documents longer than a few paragraphs, require strong reasoning, or are starting a new project where GPT-4o mini or Claude Haiku are viable alternatives.
Pricing
$1.00/1M in
$2.00/1M out
→0%since May 2026
Context
4k tokens
Speed
Very fast
This is a pinned legacy snapshot (v0613) and may eventually be deprecated by OpenAI. The 4,095-token context window is its most significant practical limitation. OpenAI's own GPT-4o mini offers drastically more context and better quality at a comparable price — strongly consider migrating.
Low cost at $1/$2 per million tokens makes it viable for large-scale batch processing
Fast inference speed suitable for latency-sensitive applications
Reliable instruction-following for structured, well-defined prompts
Stable, versioned snapshot ensures consistent, reproducible outputs over time
Weaknesses
Severely limited 4,095-token context window makes it unsuitable for long documents or multi-turn conversations
Substantially outclassed by GPT-4o mini at a similar price point for nearly every task
Frozen older checkpoint means it lacks improvements in reasoning, refusals, and factual accuracy from later model versions
Real-world use cases
What people actually use OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) for.
Classifying thousands of short customer support tickets into predefined categories at low cost
Generating short product descriptions (under 500 words) in bulk for e-commerce catalogs
Powering a simple FAQ chatbot where responses are short and context is minimal
Price History
OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) pricing over time
→0% since May 9
48 data points · tracked daily since May 9, 2026
Ready to try it?
Start using OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
High-volume, cost-sensitive text tasks like classification, summarization, and simple Q&A where bleeding-edge quality is not required.. Start free — no card required.
Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.
Compare alternatives
Similar models worth checking before you commit.
OpenAIBudget
OpenAI: GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini is OpenAI's budget-tier distillation of GPT-5, designed for high-volume, cost-sensitive tasks that don't require full flagship reasoning depth. It supersedes GPT-4o with improved instruction following and a massively expanded 400K context window at a fraction of the cost.
Verdict
The new budget default for OpenAI API users: faster, cheaper, and smarter than GPT-4o with a context window that punches well above its price tier.
Quality score
66%
Pricing
$0.25/1M in
$2.00/1M out
Speed
Very fast
Best for high-volume production workloads — chatbots, summarization pipelines, and document q&a — where cost efficiency matters more than peak reasoning.
Context
400k tokens
Output cost of $2/1M tokens is higher than some competing budget models (Gemini Flash at ~$0.60/1M output). At scale, output-heavy tasks may erode cost advantages — monitor token ratios carefully. Supersedes GPT-4o, which may be deprecated on a rolling basis.
BudgetFastLong ContextHigh VolumeOpenAI
Best for
High-volume production workloads — chatbots, summarization pipelines, and document Q&A — where cost efficiency matters more than peak reasoning.
Claude 3.5 Haiku is Anthropic's fastest and most affordable model in the Claude 3.5 family, designed for high-throughput tasks requiring quick responses without sacrificing Claude's core instruction-following quality. It handles a massive 200K context window while maintaining speed suitable for production pipelines.
Verdict
The fastest way to get Claude's quality in production — just don't confuse 'fast' with 'cheap'.
Quality score
64%
Pricing
$0.80/1M in
$4.00/1M out
Speed
Very fast
Best for high-volume, latency-sensitive applications like chatbots, classification, data extraction, and agentic tool use where speed and cost matter more than peak reasoning depth.
Context
200k tokens
Output cost of $4/1M is notably higher than competing fast/mini models. Input cost at ~$0.80/1M is competitive. Best value emerges in input-heavy pipelines like document classification or RAG retrieval where output tokens are minimal.
High-volume, latency-sensitive applications like chatbots, classification, data extraction, and agentic tool use where speed and cost matter more than peak reasoning depth.
What is OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) best for?
OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) is best for high-volume, cost-sensitive text tasks like classification, summarization, and simple q&a where bleeding-edge quality is not required.. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around balanced pricing and very fast speed.
When should I avoid OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)?
You need to process documents longer than a few paragraphs, require strong reasoning, or are starting a new project where GPT-4o mini or Claude Haiku are viable alternatives.
What is a cheaper alternative to OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)?
Meta: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is the lower-cost option to compare first when you want a similar workflow fit with less token spend.
What is a faster alternative to OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)?
OpenAI: GPT-5 Mini is the better pick when response time matters more than maximum depth or premium quality.
Newsletter
Get notified when OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) pricing changes
We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.
No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.