UseRightAI
HomeModelsAsk AIComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAICut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

Opus 4.8 vs Opus 4.7Fable 5 vs Opus 4.8New AI Models 2026ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTAll comparisons →Build your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

HomeModelsOpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex
OpenAIBalanced

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex

The go-to model for large-codebase engineering tasks, but expensive output costs limit its appeal for high-throughput pipelines.

93
Coding
58
Writing
72
Research
0
Images
52
Value
88
Long Context
Use this when

Professional software engineers who need a high-capacity model for large codebase analysis, complex refactoring, and multi-file code generation.

Skip this if

You need fast, high-volume code completions on a tight budget or require multimodal capabilities like image understanding or generation.

Pricing
$1.25/1M in
$10.00/1M out
→0%since May 2026
Context
400k tokens
Speed
Balanced

Asymmetric pricing ($1.25 input / $10 output) rewards read-heavy workflows like code review and repo analysis over generation-heavy tasks. The 400K context window is among the largest in the balanced price tier. No image input/output support confirmed at launch.

How to access
API
$1.25/1M input tokens
Subscription = chat interface. API = build with it. Compare all subscription plans
Switch to instead if...
Best overall
Claude Fable 5
Cheaper option
Meta: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Faster option
GPT-5.5

Strengths

Exceptional multi-file and large codebase understanding across its 400K context window

Stronger code generation accuracy than GPT-4o, particularly in Python, TypeScript, and systems languages

Solid reasoning over complex software architecture and debugging chains

Competitive asymmetric pricing — cheap input cost makes ingesting large repos affordable

Weaknesses

Output cost of $10/1M tokens is steep for high-volume code generation pipelines compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3.1 Pro

Not a general-purpose creative or writing model — prose quality lags behind Claude Sonnet 4.6

No native image generation or multimodal output capabilities

Real-world use cases

What people actually use OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex for.

Ingesting an entire Node.js monorepo and generating a refactoring plan with dependency impact analysis

Debugging a complex async race condition across 15+ interconnected files in a single prompt

Generating comprehensive unit test suites for legacy Python codebases with full context retention

Price History

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex pricing over time

→0% since May 9

$1.35$1.30$1.25$1.20$1.15May 9May 18May 29Jun 7Jun 17Jun 26

48 data points · tracked daily since May 9, 2026

Ready to try it?

Start using OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex

Professional software engineers who need a high-capacity model for large codebase analysis, complex refactoring, and multi-file code generation.. Start free — no card required.

Try OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex freeCompare alternatives

Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.

Compare alternatives

Similar models worth checking before you commit.

OpenAIPremium

GPT-5.5

OpenAI's latest agentic flagship for coding, research, computer-use workflows, and long multi-step knowledge work.

Verdict
Best OpenAI flagship for agentic coding, research, and computer-use work.
Quality score
94%
Pricing
$30.00/1M in
$180.00/1M out
Speed
Balanced
Best for agentic coding, computer-use workflows, and complex research tasks
Context
1M tokens
Ranked from public benchmark and pricing data verified April 26, 2026: SWE-Bench Pro 58.6%, Terminal-Bench 2.0 82.7%, $5/$30 per 1M tokens, 1M API context.
AgenticCodingComputer useLong contextPremium
Best for
Agentic coding, computer-use workflows, and complex research tasks
View model
OpenAIPremium

OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo

GPT-4 Turbo is OpenAI's high-capability flagship model featuring a 128K context window, trained on data up to April 2024. It delivers strong reasoning, coding, and instruction-following across complex tasks.

Verdict
A capable but aging flagship that has been outpaced by cheaper, faster successors in OpenAI's own lineup.
Quality score
75%
Pricing
$10.00/1M in
$30.00/1M out
Speed
Balanced
Best for complex multi-step tasks requiring deep reasoning, long document analysis, or sophisticated code generation where cost is secondary to quality.
Context
128k tokens
GPT-4 Turbo is available via the OpenAI API. It has largely been succeeded by GPT-4o, which is faster, supports vision natively, and is cheaper. Organizations should evaluate whether migrating to GPT-4o or o3 makes more sense before building new workflows on this model.
128K contextGPT-4 classfunction callingOpenAIpremium
Best for
Complex multi-step tasks requiring deep reasoning, long document analysis, or sophisticated code generation where cost is secondary to quality.
View model
OpenAIPremium

OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo (older v1106)

GPT-4 Turbo (v1106) is an older snapshot of OpenAI's flagship GPT-4 Turbo model released in November 2023, offering a 128K context window with strong general-purpose reasoning and instruction-following capabilities. It predates later GPT-4 Turbo updates and GPT-4o, making it a legacy choice for workflows locked to this specific version.

Verdict
A reliable but outdated GPT-4 snapshot that only makes sense when version pinning is a hard requirement.
Quality score
66%
Pricing
$10.00/1M in
$30.00/1M out
Speed
Balanced
Best for teams requiring a pinned, stable version of gpt-4 turbo for reproducible outputs in long-document analysis or complex instruction pipelines.
Context
128k tokens
This is a pinned model snapshot (v1106) and will not receive capability updates. OpenAI may deprecate older snapshots over time. Knowledge cutoff is April 2023. Not recommended for new deployments given the superior cost-performance of GPT-4o and GPT-4.1.
Legacy128K ContextPinned SnapshotGPT-4Premium
Best for
Teams requiring a pinned, stable version of GPT-4 Turbo for reproducible outputs in long-document analysis or complex instruction pipelines.
View model

Change history

Pricing moves, ranking shifts, and capability updates.

New ModelMar 27, 2026

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex — added to UseRightAI

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex (OpenAI) is now indexed. It supersedes GPT-4o. The go-to model for large-codebase engineering tasks, but expensive output costs limit its appeal for high-throughput pipelines.

View model

FAQ

What is OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex best for?

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex is best for professional software engineers who need a high-capacity model for large codebase analysis, complex refactoring, and multi-file code generation.. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around balanced pricing and balanced speed.

When should I avoid OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex?

You need fast, high-volume code completions on a tight budget or require multimodal capabilities like image understanding or generation.

What is a cheaper alternative to OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex?

Meta: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is the lower-cost option to compare first when you want a similar workflow fit with less token spend.

What is a faster alternative to OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex?

GPT-5.5 is the better pick when response time matters more than maximum depth or premium quality.

Newsletter

Get notified when OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex pricing changes

We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.

No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.

User reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.