Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google's I/O 2026 headliner — a Flash-tier model that beats Gemini 3.1 Pro on agentic and coding benchmarks while running roughly 4x faster than comparable frontier models.
The best Google model for serious, complex work — especially when you need to fit an entire codebase or document corpus into a single prompt.
Deep reasoning over very long documents, complex codebases, or multimodal inputs where context size is a constraint with other models.
You need fast, low-cost completions at scale — the $10/1M output cost and balanced latency make it a poor fit for high-throughput or real-time applications.
Pricing shown is for prompts under 200K tokens; inputs over 200K tokens are billed at $2.50/1M input and $15/1M output. Gemini 2.5 Pro includes built-in 'thinking' (reasoning) mode which can increase latency and cost further.
Industry-leading 1M token context window — surpasses Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-4o in raw context capacity
Strong coding and multi-step reasoning benchmarks, competitive with o3-mini on structured problem-solving
Genuinely multimodal: handles text, images, audio, and video natively in a single call
Relatively affordable for a frontier-class model at $1.25/$10 per 1M tokens compared to GPT-4o's higher output costs
Output cost of $10/1M tokens gets expensive fast for high-volume generation tasks
Response latency is noticeably slower than flash-tier models like Gemini 2.0 Flash or GPT-4o mini
Creative writing and nuanced tone control still trails Claude Sonnet 4.6
What people actually use Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro for.
Analyzing an entire software repository (~800K tokens) to identify architectural debt and suggest refactors
Summarizing and cross-referencing a 500-page legal or scientific document with precise citations
Building a multimodal pipeline that processes video frames, transcripts, and structured data in one context
Price History
↓50% since May 9
89 data points · tracked daily since May 9, 2026
Deep reasoning over very long documents, complex codebases, or multimodal inputs where context size is a constraint with other models.. Start free — no card required.
Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.
Similar models worth checking before you commit.
Google's I/O 2026 headliner — a Flash-tier model that beats Gemini 3.1 Pro on agentic and coding benchmarks while running roughly 4x faster than comparable frontier models.
Google's efficiency-focused successor to 3.5 Flash — higher scores on every benchmark Google tested, ~17% fewer output tokens, and cheaper output pricing.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 is Google's latest frontier reasoning model featuring a massive 1M token context window and strong multimodal capabilities. It targets developers and researchers needing deep analytical power with competitive pricing relative to its capability tier.
Pricing moves, ranking shifts, and capability updates.
Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro output pricing changed from $10.00/1M to $5.00/1M (↓ cheaper, 50% cut).
View modelGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Pro input pricing changed from $1.25/1M to $0.63/1M (↓ cheaper, 50% cut).
View modelGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Pro output pricing changed from $5.00/1M to $10.00/1M (↑ more expensive, 100% increase).
View modelGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Pro input pricing changed from $0.63/1M to $1.25/1M (↑ more expensive, 100% increase).
View modelGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Pro input pricing changed from $1.25/1M to $0.63/1M (↓ cheaper, 50% cut).
View modelGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Pro output pricing changed from $10.00/1M to $5.00/1M (↓ cheaper, 50% cut).
View modelGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google) is now indexed. The best Google model for serious, complex work — especially when you need to fit an entire codebase or document corpus into a single prompt.
View modelGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Pro is best for deep reasoning over very long documents, complex codebases, or multimodal inputs where context size is a constraint with other models.. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around balanced pricing and balanced speed.
You need fast, low-cost completions at scale — the $10/1M output cost and balanced latency make it a poor fit for high-throughput or real-time applications.
Mistral: Mistral Nemo is the lower-cost option to compare first when you want a similar workflow fit with less token spend.
Gemini 3.5 Flash is the better pick when response time matters more than maximum depth or premium quality.
Newsletter
We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.
No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.
No reviews yet — be the first.