UseRightAI
HomeModelsAsk AIComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAICut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

Opus 4.8 vs Opus 4.7Fable 5 vs Opus 4.8New AI Models 2026ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTAll comparisons →Build your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingCost per TaskPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansPlan Usage LimitsCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?Cheapest AI APIs

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsEditorial PolicyDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

HomeModelsClaude Opus 4.6
AnthropicPremium

Claude Opus 4.6

Previous Opus flagship, now superseded by Claude Opus 4.7.

99
Coding
94
Writing
96
Research
54
Images
8
Value
95
Long Context
Published benchmarks
80.8%
SWE-bench
1,360
Arena Elo
90.4%
MMLU
74.9%
GPQA
89.3%
MATH
Use this when

Agentic coding, complex multi-step reasoning, and deep research

Skip this if

You want the current premium coding leader, need lower cost, or are starting a new integration.

Pricing
$5.00/1M in
$25.00/1M out
↓67%since Jun 2026
Context
1M tokens
Speed
Deliberate

Claude Opus 4.6specs & pricing

Verified Sep 4, 2026 against the AI Gateway catalog
Input price
$5.00 / 1M tokens
Output price
$25.00 / 1M tokens
Cached input(prompt-cache read)
$0.50 / 1M tokens
Cache write
$6.25 / 1M tokens
Context window
1M tokens
Max output
128k tokens
Knowledge cutoff
May 31, 2025
Released
Feb 5, 2026
Input modalities
Text, Image, PDF
Output modalities
Text
Reasoning mode
Yes
Tool use
Yes
Gateway model ID
anthropic/claude-opus-4.6

Compare every model's knowledge cutoff, max output, and context window.

Keep for legacy comparisons and pinned integrations. New premium coding workflows should evaluate Opus 4.7 first.

How to access
Subscription
Claude Pro — $20/mo
API
$5/1M input tokens
Subscription = chat interface. API = build with it. Compare all subscription plans · Claude Pro usage limits
Switch to instead if...
Best overall
GPT-6 Astra
Cheaper option
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)
Faster option
Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Strengths

Strong SWE-bench Verified result from the previous Opus generation

1M token context window at standard pricing

Best agentic computer use score at 72.7% on OSWorld

Weaknesses

Premium pricing ($15/$75) makes it expensive for high-volume usage

Sonnet 4.6 is only 1.2 points behind on SWE-bench at 5× lower cost

Real-world use cases

What people actually use Claude Opus 4.6 for.

Reviewing large pull requests spanning 50+ files across a monorepo

Writing and debugging multi-step agentic workflows with tool calls and error recovery

Synthesizing long research documents into structured summaries with 1M context

How Claude Opus 4.6 compares

The nearest models people weigh against it, and what actually separates them.

vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet — Against Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Anthropic), Claude Opus 4.6 runs about 17% cheaper per token, takes 5x the context and answers slower. Which one wins depends on whether context depth or latency is your constraint.

vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) — Against Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) (Anthropic), Claude Opus 4.6 costs about 40% more per token and takes 5x the context. Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) is the one to check first if the price difference matters more than the ceiling.

vs Claude Fable 5 — Against Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic), Claude Opus 4.6 runs about 50% cheaper per token. Take Claude Opus 4.6 unless you specifically need what Claude Fable 5 does better.

Price History

Claude Opus 4.6 pricing over time

↓67% since Jun 12

$16.20$12.73$9.25$5.78$2.30Jun 12Jul 4Jul 22Aug 8Sep 2Sep 20

90 data points · tracked daily since Jun 12, 2026

Ready to try it?

Start using Claude Opus 4.6

Agentic coding, complex multi-step reasoning, and deep research. Start free — no card required.

Try Claude Opus 4.6 freeCompare alternatives

Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.

Compare alternatives

Similar models worth checking before you commit.

All Claude Opus 4.6 alternatives →
AnthropicPremium

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is Anthropic's mid-cycle flagship model, balancing strong reasoning, coding, and instruction-following with a 200K context window. It sits between Haiku and Opus in Anthropic's lineup, offering near-flagship quality at a lower cost than top-tier models.

Verdict
One of the best models for coding and complex instruction-following, but its premium pricing demands premium use cases.
Quality score
81%
Pricing
$6.00/1M in
$30.00/1M out
Speed
Balanced
3/5 speed
Context
200k tokens
Pricing at $6 input / $30 output per million tokens is significantly higher than GPT-4o ($2.50/$10). Best accessed via Anthropic API or Amazon Bedrock. Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024 version) supersedes the June 2024 release with improved performance.
CodingLong ContextInstruction FollowingReasoningPremium
Best for
Complex coding tasks, multi-step reasoning, and long-document analysis where GPT-4o-class quality is needed without paying for the absolute top tier.
View model
AnthropicBalanced

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet with extended thinking enabled — Anthropic's hybrid reasoning model that explicitly deliberates before responding, surfacing its chain-of-thought for complex multi-step problems. It sits between standard Sonnet and full reasoning-only models, balancing depth with practical usability.

Verdict
The most transparent reasoning model on the market — ideal when you need to see and trust the thought process, not just the answer.
Quality score
73%
Pricing
$3.00/1M in
$15.00/1M out
Speed
Deliberate
2/5 speed
Context
200k tokens
Thinking tokens (the internal reasoning trace) count toward output token billing, which can significantly increase costs on complex queries. The thinking budget can often be configured via the API. Best used selectively for tasks that genuinely benefit from deliberation rather than as a default model.
ReasoningExtended ThinkingCodingAgenticAnthropic
Best for
Tackling complex coding challenges, mathematical proofs, and multi-step logical problems where visible reasoning and higher accuracy matter more than speed.
View model
AnthropicPremium

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic's new Mythos-class flagship and the most capable coding model anyone can use — 80.3% SWE-Bench Pro, an 11-point jump over Opus 4.8. 1M context, 128K output, native parallel subagents. Released June 9, 2026.

Verdict
New global #1 — 80.3% SWE-Bench Pro, the most capable model generally available.
Quality score
98%
Pricing
$10.00/1M in
$50.00/1M out
Speed
Deliberate
2/5 speed
Context
1M tokens
Launched June 9, 2026 as the public, Mythos-class release. Available on the Claude API, Microsoft Foundry, and Google Vertex AI. Free for all users until June 22, 2026. Same underlying model as Claude Mythos 5, with safeguards that block specific high-risk cyber responses.
Coding leaderSWE-Bench Pro #1Mythos-classParallel subagentsAgenticLong contextPremiumNew
Best for
The hardest coding tasks, autonomous multi-step agents, and frontier-grade reasoning
View model

Claude Opus 4.6 head-to-head

All Claude Opus 4.6 alternatives →DeepSeek R1 vs Claude Opus 4.6 →DeepSeek V3 vs Claude Opus 4.6 →Grok 4 vs Claude Opus 4.6 →Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.6 →GPT-5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 →Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro →GPT-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6 →GPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.6 →Llama 4 Maverick vs Claude Opus 4.6 →Mistral Large 2 vs Claude Opus 4.6 →Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.6 →Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 →View benchmark scores →

Change history

Pricing moves, ranking shifts, and capability updates.

PricingSep 1, 2026

Claude Opus 4.6 — output price cut

Claude Opus 4.6 output pricing changed from $75.00/1M to $12.50/1M (↓ cheaper, 83% cut).

View model
PricingSep 1, 2026

Claude Opus 4.6 — input price cut

Claude Opus 4.6 input pricing changed from $15.00/1M to $2.50/1M (↓ cheaper, 83% cut).

View model
PricingMar 27, 2026

Claude Opus 4.6 — input price cut

Claude Opus 4.6 input pricing changed from $15.00/1M to $5.00/1M (↓ cheaper, 67% cut).

View model
PricingMar 27, 2026

Claude Opus 4.6 — output price cut

Claude Opus 4.6 output pricing changed from $75.00/1M to $25.00/1M (↓ cheaper, 67% cut).

View model

FAQ

How much does Claude Opus 4.6 cost?

Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output tokens on the API, with cached input at $0.5 per million. A month of 10M input and 2M output tokens runs about $100.00 at list price, before any batch or caching discounts.

What is the context window of Claude Opus 4.6?

Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1M tokens context window, with up to 128k tokens of output per response. That is the total of prompt plus response the model can hold in one request.

What is the knowledge cutoff of Claude Opus 4.6?

Claude Opus 4.6's training data runs through May 31, 2025, and the model was released on February 5, 2026. For anything after that date it needs web search or documents in the prompt.

What is Claude Opus 4.6 best for?

Claude Opus 4.6 is best for agentic coding, complex multi-step reasoning, and deep research. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around premium pricing and deliberate speed.

When should I avoid Claude Opus 4.6?

You want the current premium coding leader, need lower cost, or are starting a new integration.

What is a cheaper alternative to Claude Opus 4.6?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) (Anthropic) at $3.00/1M/1M input against Claude Opus 4.6's $5.00/1M/1M — roughly 40% less per token all in. The most transparent reasoning model on the market — ideal when you need to see and trust the thought process, not just the answer. Compare it first if Claude Opus 4.6's pricing is the thing stopping you.

What is a faster alternative to Claude Opus 4.6?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet — balanced against Claude Opus 4.6's deliberate, with 200k tokens of context. Worth the swap when response time is what your users notice rather than the last few points of reasoning depth.

Newsletter

Get notified when Claude Opus 4.6 pricing changes

We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.

No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.

User reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.