Mistral Medium 3.5
A 128B dense open-weight multimodal model handling reasoning, coding, and vision in one set of weights — frontier-adjacent coding at mid-tier prices, self-hostable under a modified MIT license.
Ultra-cheap multimodal model for massive-volume, low-complexity pipelines.
Ultra-high-volume classification, summarisation, and lightweight vision tasks
You need reliable multi-step reasoning or coding quality — it won't hold up.
At $0.10/1M input, the cost question disappears. The only question is whether the task complexity exceeds what Mistral Small can handle.
One of the cheapest models in the directory at $0.10/1M input
Multimodal — handles images alongside text at this price point
Fast and efficient for simple, well-defined tasks
Weak on complex reasoning, hard coding, and nuanced writing
Not suitable for tasks requiring deep context retention or multi-step logic
Limited to simpler use cases compared to Codestral or DeepSeek V3
What people actually use Mistral Small 3.1 for.
Bulk document classification and tagging pipelines at near-zero cost
Image description and OCR-adjacent tasks where full multimodal models are overkill
High-frequency lightweight summarisation in cost-sensitive products
Price History
↑251% since May 8
86 data points · tracked daily since May 8, 2026
Ultra-high-volume classification, summarisation, and lightweight vision tasks. Start free — no card required.
Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.
Similar models worth checking before you commit.
A 128B dense open-weight multimodal model handling reasoning, coding, and vision in one set of weights — frontier-adjacent coding at mid-tier prices, self-hostable under a modified MIT license.
Lower-cost OpenAI model that keeps a solid balance of usefulness, speed, and affordability for everyday tasks.
Versatile multimodal model that handles image-related workflows and mixed-media prompts well.
Mistral Small 3.1 is best for ultra-high-volume classification, summarisation, and lightweight vision tasks. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around budget pricing and very fast speed.
You need reliable multi-step reasoning or coding quality — it won't hold up.
GPT-5.6 Terra is the lower-cost option to compare first when you want a similar workflow fit with less token spend.
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the better pick when response time matters more than maximum depth or premium quality.
Newsletter
We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.
No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.
No reviews yet — be the first.