GPT-5.5
OpenAI's latest agentic flagship for coding, research, computer-use workflows, and long multi-step knowledge work.
The go-to model for large-codebase reasoning, but its output pricing makes it a considered rather than casual choice.
Professional developers tackling large-scale coding tasks, refactoring legacy codebases, or working across multi-file projects where deep context retention is critical.
You need fast, cheap, iterative code completions at high volume — a smaller model like GPT-5 Mini or Claude Haiku will be significantly more cost-effective for autocomplete-style tasks.
Priced asymmetrically with low input cost ($1.75/1M) and high output cost ($14/1M), which rewards concise prompting but penalizes verbose code generation. The 400K context window is one of the largest available at this price tier. Supersedes GPT-5.2 with improved multi-file coherence; users on GPT-5.2 should migrate. No multimodal input support confirmed at launch.
400K context window enables full repository ingestion and multi-file code reasoning in a single prompt
Specialized Codex training produces more accurate, idiomatic code generation across Python, TypeScript, Rust, and Go compared to general-purpose GPT-5 variants
Strong at debugging complex stacktraces and proposing minimal, targeted diffs rather than rewriting entire functions
Reliable instruction-following for structured outputs like JSON schemas, API specs, and test suites
Output cost of $14/1M tokens makes iterative coding sessions expensive compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($15 output) or Gemini 3.1 Pro, but the asymmetric input/output pricing penalizes verbose code generation specifically
Not a general-purpose creative writing or multimodal model — performance degrades noticeably outside technical domains
No native image input or output support, limiting its use for UI/UX tasks requiring visual context
What people actually use OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex for.
Ingesting an entire Node.js monorepo (200K tokens) and generating a migration plan to TypeScript with annotated file-by-file changes
Debugging a complex Rust async runtime issue by analyzing full call stacks, dependency source code, and test logs in a single context window
Generating a comprehensive OpenAPI 3.1 spec and matching integration test suite from a plain-English product requirements document
Price History
→0% since May 9
48 data points · tracked daily since May 9, 2026
Professional developers tackling large-scale coding tasks, refactoring legacy codebases, or working across multi-file projects where deep context retention is critical.. Start free — no card required.
Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.
Similar models worth checking before you commit.
OpenAI's latest agentic flagship for coding, research, computer-use workflows, and long multi-step knowledge work.
GPT-4 Turbo is OpenAI's high-capability flagship model featuring a 128K context window, trained on data up to April 2024. It delivers strong reasoning, coding, and instruction-following across complex tasks.
GPT-4 Turbo (v1106) is an older snapshot of OpenAI's flagship GPT-4 Turbo model released in November 2023, offering a 128K context window with strong general-purpose reasoning and instruction-following capabilities. It predates later GPT-4 Turbo updates and GPT-4o, making it a legacy choice for workflows locked to this specific version.
Pricing moves, ranking shifts, and capability updates.
OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex (OpenAI) is now indexed. It supersedes GPT-5.2. The go-to model for large-codebase reasoning, but its output pricing makes it a considered rather than casual choice.
View modelOpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex is best for professional developers tackling large-scale coding tasks, refactoring legacy codebases, or working across multi-file projects where deep context retention is critical.. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around balanced pricing and balanced speed.
You need fast, cheap, iterative code completions at high volume — a smaller model like GPT-5 Mini or Claude Haiku will be significantly more cost-effective for autocomplete-style tasks.
Meta: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is the lower-cost option to compare first when you want a similar workflow fit with less token spend.
GPT-5.5 is the better pick when response time matters more than maximum depth or premium quality.
Newsletter
We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.
No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.
No reviews yet — be the first.