UseRightAI
UseRightAI logo
HomeModelsComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAI
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.
UseRightAI logo
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTBuild your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

Trending Now

Trending AI Tools & Models

Recently updated models, rising comparisons, and the AI tools teams are actively switching to — refreshed hourly.

Updated Apr 29, 2026
Rankings refresh dailyScored on 6 criteriaNo paid rankings
Instant answer

Claude Opus 4.7 is the top trending model right now — it leads SWE-Bench Pro (64.3%) after its April 2026 launch. GPT-5.5 is trending for OpenAI agentic workflows. Llama 4 Maverick is the biggest open-source story: frontier-class quality, zero API cost.

If you haven't re-evaluated your AI stack since early 2026, now is a good time. Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 both change the premium tier calculus significantly.

Most teams don't need to switch every cycle — but the Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 releases are meaningful quality jumps over their predecessors.

Claude Opus 4.7 reviewAll 2026 releases

Trending Comparisons

The most-searched head-to-head comparisons right now.

Most searchedClaude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.5Compare →Upgrade guideClaude Opus 4.7 vs Sonnet 4.6Compare →OpenAI upgradeGPT-5.5 vs GPT-5.4Compare →Premium battleClaude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4Compare →Open vs closed

Recently Updated Models

Models with the latest pricing, scoring, or capability updates in the directory.

AnthropicPremium

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4 is Anthropic's most capable flagship model, designed for complex reasoning, nuanced writing, and sophisticated multi-step tasks. It sits at the top of the Claude 4 family, prioritizing depth and quality over speed.

Verdict
Anthropic's best model for when quality matters more than speed or cost.
Quality score
84%
Pricing
$15.00/1M in
$75.00/1M out
Speed

Trending Guides

Use-case pages getting the most attention this week.

Best AI for CodingUpdated after Claude Opus 4.7 releaseRead guide →Best AI for AgentsSWE-bench & Terminal-Bench rankedRead guide →New Models in 2026Full 2026 release timelineRead guide →Open-Source AI 2026Llama 4, DeepSeek, Mistral rankedRead guide →Best AI for Long Docs2M token context comparisonRead guide →Cheapest Frontier AI

Recent Updates

Full change log →
pricingApr 29, 2026

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 — input price cut

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 input pricing changed from $30.00/1M to $15.00/1M (↓ cheaper, 50% cut).

View anthropic-claude-opus-4 →
pricingApr 29, 2026

Grok 4 — output price cut

Grok 4 output pricing changed from $6.00/1M to $0.50/1M (↓ cheaper, 92% cut).

View grok-4 →
pricingApr 29, 2026

GPT-5.4 — input price cut

GPT-5.4 input pricing changed from $8.00/1M to $0.20/1M (↓ cheaper, 98% cut).

View gpt-5-4 →
pricing

Newsletter

Get trending updates before the noise

Pricing changes, new model releases, and ranking shifts — straight to your inbox when they matter.

No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.

FAQ

Which AI model is trending right now?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the most-searched model right now after its April 2026 release — it leads SWE-Bench Pro with a 64.3% coding score. GPT-5.5 is trending for OpenAI-native agentic workflows. Llama 4 Maverick is trending in the open-source community for matching frontier closed models at zero cost.

What is the newest AI model in 2026?

The newest major models in 2026 are Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic, April 2026), GPT-5.5 (OpenAI), and Llama 4 Scout and Maverick (Meta). All are available via API and have been added to the UseRightAI directory.

How often does this page update?

This page refreshes every hour to reflect the latest model updates, pricing changes, and ranking shifts. When a major new model launches or a significant pricing change happens, it appears here first.

What AI tools are people switching to in 2026?

Based on search trends and usage signals, teams are switching from GPT-4o to Claude Sonnet 4.6 for daily coding and writing. Developers exploring open-source are moving toward Llama 4 Maverick. Budget-conscious teams are adopting Gemini 3.1 Flash for high-volume pipelines.

Keep exploring

Browse all modelsCompare side by sideCompare pricingFull change logBest AI in 2026Which AI should I use?Find my AIBenchmark scores
DeepSeek V3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Compare →
Free vs paidLlama 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Compare →
RisingGrok 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Compare →
Flagship battleGPT-5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Compare →
Deliberate
Best for demanding professional tasks requiring deep reasoning, nuanced judgment, and high-quality long-form output.
Context
200k tokens
At $15 input / $75 output per 1M tokens, Opus 4 is one of the most expensive models available. Anthropic recommends using Claude Sonnet 4 for most production use cases and reserving Opus 4 for tasks explicitly requiring maximum capability.
FlagshipPremiumReasoningLong ContextAgentic
Best for
Demanding professional tasks requiring deep reasoning, nuanced judgment, and high-quality long-form output.
View model
GoogleBudget

Gemini 3.1 Flash

Fast, low-cost model with a 1M token context window — the best budget default for teams running high prompt volumes.

Verdict
Best cheap AI for broad day-to-day work — now with 1M context.
Quality score
75%
Pricing
$0.50/1M in
$3.00/1M out
Speed
Very fast
Best for high-volume everyday ai usage where speed and cost both matter
Context
1M tokens
The default budget pick for startups watching cost. The 1M context at this price is unmatched.
Best budgetFast1M contextScalable
Best for
High-volume everyday AI usage where speed and cost both matter
View model
OpenAIBalanced

GPT-4o

Versatile multimodal model that handles image-related workflows and mixed-media prompts well.

Verdict
Best all-around pick for image-heavy and multimodal workflows.
Quality score
67%
Pricing
$0.15/1M in
$0.60/1M out
Speed
Fast
Best for multimodal tasks and image-adjacent workflows
Context
128k tokens
Strong when your work lives between visuals, messaging, and product context.
ImagesMultimodalCreative
Best for
Multimodal tasks and image-adjacent workflows
View model
OpenAIPremium

GPT-5.2

Reliable OpenAI flagship for serious coding and product work — a strong default before GPT-5.4 was released.

Verdict
Capable but outclassed — GPT-5.4 is now cheaper and better.
Quality score
79%
Pricing
$1.75/1M in
$14.00/1M out
Speed
Balanced
Best for serious coding and complex product work
Context
200k tokens
Worth considering only if you have existing integrations built around this model.
Former top pickCodingReasoningPremium
Best for
Serious coding and complex product work
View model
OpenAIPremium

GPT-5.4

OpenAI's latest flagship with unique desktop-control capabilities — it can see your screen, click, and navigate apps via the API.

Verdict
Best for agentic automation and desktop control workflows.
Quality score
84%
Pricing
$0.20/1M in
$1.25/1M out
Speed
Balanced
Best for agentic workflows, desktop automation, and complex multi-step reasoning
Context
272k tokens
Unique value is the computer-use capability. If you're building agents that operate software, nothing else compares right now.
AgenticDesktop controlReasoningPremium
Best for
Agentic workflows, desktop automation, and complex multi-step reasoning
View model
xAIBalanced

Grok 4

xAI's latest flagship with strong coding benchmark performance, a 2M token context window, and aggressive pricing at $2/$6 per million tokens.

Verdict
Strong coding value with 2M context — an underrated pick at this price.
Quality score
81%
Pricing
$0.20/1M in
$0.50/1M out
Speed
Fast
Best for coding and research at competitive pricing with maximum context
Context
2M tokens
Best when you want near-flagship coding quality with a massive context window at a mid-tier price.
Coding2M contextValuexAI
Best for
Coding and research at competitive pricing with maximum context
View model
MistralBudget

Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512

Mistral Large 3 2512 is Mistral's flagship dense model updated in December 2025, offering strong multilingual reasoning and coding capabilities at a significantly reduced price point compared to its predecessor. It targets enterprise workloads that need high-quality outputs without paying top-tier frontier model prices.

Verdict
The best price-per-quality ratio in the non-mini flagship tier, especially for multilingual and long-context enterprise tasks.
Quality score
69%
Pricing
$0.50/1M in
$1.50/1M out
Speed
Balanced
Best for multilingual enterprise tasks, code generation, and long-document analysis where cost efficiency matters more than absolute state-of-the-art performance.
Context
262k tokens
Pricing of $0.50 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens places it firmly in the budget-flagship category. Available via Mistral API (La Plateforme) and major cloud providers. December 2025 update ('2512') improves instruction following over the earlier 2407 release.
Budget flagshipMultilingualLong contextEnterpriseCode
Best for
Multilingual enterprise tasks, code generation, and long-document analysis where cost efficiency matters more than absolute state-of-the-art performance.
View model
MistralBudget

Mistral: Mistral Nemo

Mistral Nemo is a compact 12B-parameter open-weight model developed in collaboration with NVIDIA, designed to deliver strong multilingual and instruction-following performance at an extremely low cost. It fits into a 128K context window and is optimized for deployment efficiency without sacrificing too much reasoning depth.

Verdict
A dirt-cheap multilingual model perfect for bulk text tasks, but don't expect frontier-level reasoning.
Quality score
55%
Pricing
$0.02/1M in
$0.03/1M out
Speed
Fast
Best for teams needing a cheap, fast, multilingual workhorse for classification, summarization, or light coding tasks at scale.
Context
131k tokens
Mistral Nemo is open-weight (Apache 2.0 license), so self-hosting is an option for teams that want to eliminate API costs entirely. Pricing via API is through Mistral's La Plateforme. The model uses a Tekken tokenizer which is more efficient than older Mistral tokenizers, especially for non-English text.
budgetmultilingualopen-weight12Befficient
Best for
Teams needing a cheap, fast, multilingual workhorse for classification, summarization, or light coding tasks at scale.
View model
Browse all 119 models →
Full price breakdown 2026
Read guide →
Free AI ModelsNo-cost options rankedRead guide →
Fastest AI ModelsSpeed & latency comparisonRead guide →
Apr 29, 2026

Gemini 3.1 Flash — output price increase

Gemini 3.1 Flash output pricing changed from $1.50/1M to $3.00/1M (↑ more expensive, 100% increase).

View gemini-3-1-flash →
pricingApr 29, 2026

GPT-5.2 — output price cut

GPT-5.2 output pricing changed from $168.00/1M to $14.00/1M (↓ cheaper, 92% cut).

View gpt-5-2 →
pricingApr 29, 2026

Grok 4 — input price cut

Grok 4 input pricing changed from $2.00/1M to $0.20/1M (↓ cheaper, 90% cut).

View grok-4 →