UseRightAI
UseRightAI logo
HomeModelsComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAI
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.
UseRightAI logo
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTBuild your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

Head-to-head · Updated May 2026

Data verified May 2026

GPT-5.5 vs GPT-5.4

GPT-5.5 is the stronger model if quality matters: it improves on GPT-5.4 in public coding and terminal-workflow benchmarks, expands API context to 1M tokens, and is the new OpenAI premium pick. GPT-5.4 still matters if cost is the main constraint, since its listed input price is lower. For new OpenAI-first coding or agent workflows, GPT-5.5 is the better default.

OpenAIPremium

GPT-5.5

Best OpenAI flagship for agentic coding, research, and computer-use work.

Winner
VS
OpenAIPremium

GPT-5.4

Best for agentic automation and desktop control workflows.

At a glance

GPT-5.5GPT-5.4
Input cost / 1M tokens$$30.00/1M$$0.20/1M
Output cost / 1M tokens$$180.00/1M$$15.00/1M
Context window1M tokens272k tokens
SpeedBalancedBalanced
Price tierPremiumPremium
Benchmarks
SWE-bench (coding)—74.9%
Arena Elo—1,355
MMLU—91%

How they compare

Which model wins for each use case — and why.

CodingGPT-5.5 wins

GPT-5.5 scores 58.6% on SWE-Bench Pro vs GPT-5.4 at 57.7%, and improves more clearly on Terminal-Bench 2.0.

Agentic terminal workGPT-5.5 wins

GPT-5.5 reaches 82.7% on Terminal-Bench 2.0 vs GPT-5.4 at 75.1%, a bigger practical gap for tool-using coding agents.

PriceGPT-5.4 wins

GPT-5.4 remains cheaper in the catalog, so it can still be the better value when you do not need GPT-5.5's ceiling.

ContextGPT-5.5 wins

GPT-5.5 has a 1M API context window, while GPT-5.4 is listed with a smaller context window in the current catalog.

Which should you pick?

Pick GPT-5.5 if…

  • You are starting a new OpenAI-first coding or agent workflow
  • You need a 1M token context window
  • Terminal workflows, tool use, and benchmark ceiling matter more than price
View GPT-5.5 details

Pick GPT-5.4 if…

  • You already have GPT-5.4 integrations that work well
  • You want lower token costs
  • Your tasks are routine enough that GPT-5.5's quality gap will not matter
View GPT-5.4 details

Bottom line

For most workflows, GPT-5.5 is the stronger choice.

The strongest OpenAI pick for agentic coding and knowledge work. Claude Opus 4.7 still wins on the public SWE-Bench Pro coding number, but GPT-5.5 is the better OpenAI default when ecosystem, Codex, or computer-use workflows matter.

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.5 better than GPT-5.4?

Yes for quality. GPT-5.5 improves on GPT-5.4 on SWE-Bench Pro and Terminal-Bench 2.0, and it has a larger 1M API context window.

Should I upgrade from GPT-5.4 to GPT-5.5?

Upgrade for coding agents, large-context work, or high-value tasks. Stay with GPT-5.4 when cost matters more than the last few points of quality.

Which one is cheaper?

GPT-5.4 is cheaper in the current catalog. GPT-5.5 is the premium OpenAI pick, not the budget pick.

Related comparisons

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.5GPT-5.5models/gpt 5 4Best AI for Coding

Newsletter

Get model updates before your workflow falls behind

Pricing changes, new model releases, and updated recommendations — delivered when it matters.

No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.