UseRightAI
UseRightAI logo
HomeModelsComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAI
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.
UseRightAI logo
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTBuild your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

HomeClaude Opus 4.7
AnthropicReleased Apr 16, 2026#1 Coding Model

Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic's most capable public model. Best-in-class coding, 1M context, hybrid reasoning — and the same $5/$25 pricing as its predecessor.

Input
$5/1M
Output
$25/1M
Context
1M tokens
SWE-bench
64.3%
Use this when
  • You run complex agentic coding pipelines or autonomous software engineering
  • Your use case involves large documents, full codebases, or multi-file context
  • You need top-tier professional output: financial models, technical reports, data viz
  • Vision accuracy on high-resolution images matters (diagrams, charts, screenshots)
  • You're building on the API and will use prompt caching to control costs
Skip this if
  • Speed matters more than depth — Claude Sonnet 4.6 is significantly faster
  • You're on a tight token budget and your prompts map poorly with the new tokenizer
  • Your tasks are routine: drafting emails, summarizing short docs, quick Q&A
  • You need image generation built in — Opus 4.7 is a text model
How to access
Claude Pro / Max
claude.ai — from $20/mo
API
claude-opus-4-7-20260416
Cloud providers
AWS · Google · Azure

What's new in Opus 4.7

Released April 16, 2026 — the biggest Opus upgrade since 4.6.

Coding leap

SWE-bench Pro score jumped from 53.4% → 64.3%, overtaking GPT-5.4 (57.7%). On a 93-task internal benchmark, Opus 4.7 resolved 13% more tasks than its predecessor — including four that no prior Claude model could solve.

1M context window

Expanded from 200K to 1 million tokens — fit entire codebases, full legal documents, or hours of transcripts into a single request without chunking.

xhigh effort level

A new reasoning effort setting between high and max. Lets you dial up reasoning depth on hard problems without paying the full latency cost of max effort.

Vision leap

Vision accuracy jumped from 54.5% → 98.5% — near-perfect. Combined with 3× higher resolution (2,576px, ~3.75MP). Diagrams, scanned contracts, financial tables, and screenshots are now read reliably.

Agent improvements

Better long-horizon autonomy, improved systems engineering, and new task budgets and Claude Code review tools make Opus 4.7 the clearest choice for autonomous coding agents.

New tokenizer — watch costs

Opus 4.7 uses a new tokenizer that encodes the same text into up to 1.35× more tokens. Per-token prices are the same as Opus 4.6 — but actual costs per request can be meaningfully higher on long prompts.

Opus 4.7 vs Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4

Head-to-head on the metrics that matter most.

MetricOpus 4.7Opus 4.6GPT-5.4
SWE-bench Pro (coding)64.3%53.4%57.7%
SWE-bench Verified87.6%80.8%~80%
CursorBench (agents)70%58%58%
GPQA Diamond (reasoning)94.2%~90%94.4%
Vision accuracy98.5%54.5%Lower
Context window1M tokens200K tokens128K tokens
Vision resolution2,576px (~3.75MP)~800px2,048px
Input pricing$5/1M$5/1M$0.75/1M
Output pricing$25/1M$25/1M$4.50/1M

SWE-bench Pro scores as of April 16, 2026. Pricing in USD per million tokens at standard API rates.

Strengths

Best-in-class coding: 64.3% on SWE-bench Pro, #1 across all public models

Massive 1M token context window — handles entire codebases in one shot

Hybrid reasoning with new xhigh effort for deeper problem solving

Vision accuracy jumped from 54.5% → 98.5% — near-perfect on charts, docs, screenshots

Vision up to 2,576px long edge (~3.75 MP) — 3× higher resolution than prior Claude

Best for long-running agents: systems engineering, complex multi-step tasks

Strong at professional document work: slides, financial analysis, data visualization

90% cost reduction with prompt caching; 50% with batch processing

Available on every major cloud: AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex, Microsoft Foundry

Weaknesses

New tokenizer maps text to up to 1.35× more tokens — real cost can exceed Opus 4.6

Slower than Claude Sonnet 4.6 — not ideal for high-volume or latency-sensitive apps

No built-in image generation (text model only)

Max effort settings add latency — not suitable for real-time chat at scale

Overkill for simple tasks: writing emails, basic Q&A, short summaries

Pricing deep-dive

Same per-token rates as Opus 4.6 — but the new tokenizer changes your effective cost.

Standard
$5 / 1M input
$25 / 1M output
With prompt caching
$0.50 / 1M input
Up to 90% savings on repeated context
Batch processing
$2.50 / 1M input
50% off for async / non-real-time workloads

Tokenizer note: Opus 4.7 uses a new tokenizer that can encode the same prompt into up to 1.35× more tokens than Opus 4.6. Your actual spend per request may be higher even though the per-token price is unchanged. Test your specific prompts before migrating production workloads.

Compare Claude Opus 4.7

See how it fits across the full model landscape.

Opus 4.7 vs Opus 4.6
Migration guide, tokenizer impact, when to upgrade
Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4
Full benchmark comparison, cost at scale
Is Opus 4.7 worth it?
Honest verdict by use case
API developer guide
Model ID, effort levels, code examples
What is Claude Mythos?
The even more powerful model Anthropic won't release
Best AI for coding
Full coding model rankings updated daily

Frequently asked questions

What is Claude Opus 4.7?

Claude Opus 4.7 is Anthropic's most capable publicly available model, released April 16 2026. It's a hybrid reasoning model with a 1 million token context window, improved coding and agent capabilities, and a new xhigh effort level. It's the second most powerful Anthropic model overall — after Claude Mythos, which is restricted to select research partners.

How much does Claude Opus 4.7 cost?

Claude Opus 4.7 is priced at $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output tokens — the same nominal price as Opus 4.6. However, Opus 4.7 uses a new tokenizer that maps text to up to 1.35× more tokens, so real-world costs per request can be higher. Prompt caching cuts costs by up to 90%, and batch processing saves 50%.

How does Claude Opus 4.7 compare to GPT-5.4 on coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 leads on SWE-bench Pro with a score of 64.3%, ahead of GPT-5.4 at 57.7%. On a 93-task coding benchmark it resolved 13% more tasks than Opus 4.6, including four tasks that neither Opus 4.6 nor Sonnet 4.6 could solve.

Should I upgrade from Claude Opus 4.6 to 4.7?

Upgrade if you run complex agentic coding workflows, work with large images, or need the deepest long-horizon reasoning available. Stay on Opus 4.6 if your tasks are straightforward and you're sensitive to token cost — the new tokenizer means identical prompts can cost up to 35% more with Opus 4.7.

What is the xhigh effort level in Claude Opus 4.7?

xhigh is a new reasoning effort setting that sits between the existing high and max levels. It gives developers finer control over the tradeoff between reasoning depth and latency on hard problems — useful when you need deeper thinking than high but don't want the latency of max.

Where can I access Claude Opus 4.7?

Claude Opus 4.7 is available on claude.ai (Pro and Max subscription plans), the Anthropic API, AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex AI, and Microsoft Foundry (Azure). The model ID is claude-opus-4-7-20260416.

How is Claude Opus 4.7 different from Claude Mythos?

Claude Mythos is Anthropic's most powerful model overall but is not publicly available — it's currently limited to 11 organizations for cybersecurity research. Opus 4.7 is the most capable model you can actually use today. Notably, Anthropic deliberately reduced cyber capabilities in Opus 4.7 compared to what Mythos can do.

Browse all models Best AI for coding Compare all pricing