UseRightAI
HomeModelsAsk AIComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAICut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

Opus 4.8 vs Opus 4.7Fable 5 vs Opus 4.8New AI Models 2026ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTAll comparisons →Build your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

HomeModelsQwen 3.8 Max
AlibabaBalanced

Qwen 3.8 Max

Best Chinese flagship — beats GPT-5.6 Sol on coding, #2 globally for vision.

93
Coding
85
Writing
88
Research
93
Images
64
Value
90
Long Context
Use this when

Multimodal and vision-heavy workloads at scale

Skip this if

You need independently verified benchmarks or Western data residency.

Pricing
$2.00/1M in
$6.00/1M out
Context
1M tokens
Speed
Balanced

Announced August 3, 2026 on Alibaba Cloud Model Studio; open weights promised a week after launch. $2/$6 is first-party Model Studio pricing; cache reads from $0.17/1M. Announcement moved Alibaba stock +7% in Hong Kong.

How to access
API
$2/1M input tokens
Subscription = chat interface. API = build with it. Compare all subscription plans
Switch to instead if...
Best overall
Claude Fable 5
Cheaper option
Mistral: Mistral Nemo

Strengths

SWE-bench Pro 67.7 — ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol and close to Claude Opus 4.8

#2 globally on Arena.AI vision (behind only a Claude Fable 5 variant); #1 Chinese model for text

First Alibaba open-weights release at this scale — 2.4T MoE at $2/$6 per 1M

Weaknesses

Well behind Claude Fable 5 on SWE-bench Pro (67.7 vs 80.0) and behind several Anthropic models on text rankings

No independent third-party benchmarks at GA — early claims are largely Alibaba-reported

Real-world use cases

What people actually use Qwen 3.8 Max for.

Agentic coding — 67.7 SWE-bench Pro, ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol (64.6) and near Claude Opus 4.8 (69.2)

Vision-heavy pipelines: image and video understanding ranked #2 globally on Arena.AI

Large-scale deployments where 95B active params keep inference cost moderate

Ready to try it?

Start using Qwen 3.8 Max

Multimodal and vision-heavy workloads at scale. Start free — no card required.

Try Qwen 3.8 Max freeCompare alternatives

Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.

Qwen 3.8 Max head-to-head

All Qwen 3.8 Max alternatives →Kimi K3 vs Qwen 3.8 Max →Qwen 3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4-Pro →Qwen 3.8 Max vs GPT-5.6 Sol →View benchmark scores →

FAQ

What is Qwen 3.8 Max best for?

Qwen 3.8 Max is best for multimodal and vision-heavy workloads at scale. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around balanced pricing and balanced speed.

When should I avoid Qwen 3.8 Max?

You need independently verified benchmarks or Western data residency.

What is a cheaper alternative to Qwen 3.8 Max?

Mistral: Mistral Nemo is the lower-cost option to compare first when you want a similar workflow fit with less token spend.

What is a faster alternative to Qwen 3.8 Max?

Qwen 3.8 Max is the better pick when response time matters more than maximum depth or premium quality.

Newsletter

Get notified when Qwen 3.8 Max pricing changes

We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.

No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.

User reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.