Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic's September 28, 2026 Sonnet — built for well-scoped everyday work like features, bug fixes, documents, slides and spreadsheets, priced at $2/$10 and close to Opus 5.5 on most of Anthropic's launch rows.
Anthropic's new coding default — top SWE-bench Pro score at a lower price than Opus 5.
Agentic coding, long-running agents and knowledge work where Opus 5 was the bar
Your tasks are well-scoped and latency-sensitive — Sonnet 5.5 is half the price and Anthropic says it is the fastest Sonnet yet.
Compare every model's knowledge cutoff, max output, and context window.
Released September 22, 2026. Gateway id anthropic/claude-opus-5.5. $4/$20 per 1M (cache read $0.20, cache write $5); Fast mode $8/$40. 1,000,000 context, 128,000 max output, knowledge cutoff June 2026, effort levels low to max. Launch figures as reported by Anthropic: SWE-bench Pro 89.9 (Fable 5.1 81.2, Opus 5 79.2); SWE-bench Multilingual 93.9; Terminal-Bench 4.0 66.4 (xhigh); OSWorld 2.1 81.8; Humanity's Last Exam 67.7; Toolathlon Verified 77.8 (Opus 5 80.6). Verified October 10, 2026.
SWE-bench Pro 89.9% in Anthropic's launch table, ahead of Claude Fable 5.1 (81.2%) and Opus 5 (79.2%)
Cheaper than the model it replaces: $4/$20 per 1M against Opus 5's $5/$25, and cache reads at $0.20/1M
1M context and 128K output at standard rates, with effort levels up to max
Not ahead everywhere: Anthropic's own table has Opus 5 higher on Toolathlon Verified (80.6% vs 77.8%)
Fast mode doubles the price to $8/$40
Terminal-Bench 4.0 differs by effort setting (66.4% at xhigh, 64.8% at max), so single-digit gaps against rivals are directional
What people actually use Claude Opus 5.5 for.
Repository-scale changes and PR work — Anthropic reports 89.9% on SWE-bench Pro, up from 79.2% for Opus 5
Long unattended agent runs where per-task token spend matters as much as the per-token price
Reports, analysis and briefs that need to state findings and next steps plainly
The nearest models people weigh against it, and what actually separates them.
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 — Against Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic), Claude Opus 5.5 costs about 50% more per token and answers slower. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the one to check first if the price difference matters more than the ceiling.
vs Claude Fable 5.1 — Against Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic), Claude Opus 5.5 runs about 60% cheaper per token. Take Claude Opus 5.5 unless you specifically need what Claude Fable 5.1 does better.
vs Claude Fable 5 — Against Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic), Claude Opus 5.5 runs about 60% cheaper per token. Take Claude Opus 5.5 unless you specifically need what Claude Fable 5 does better.
Agentic coding, long-running agents and knowledge work where Opus 5 was the bar. Start free — no card required.
Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.
Similar models worth checking before you commit.
Anthropic's September 28, 2026 Sonnet — built for well-scoped everyday work like features, bug fixes, documents, slides and spreadsheets, priced at $2/$10 and close to Opus 5.5 on most of Anthropic's launch rows.
Anthropic's September 1, 2026 frontier release and the new capability ceiling for coding, agents, and scientific work. Base pricing is unchanged at $10/$50, but cache reads dropped 75% to $0.25/1M — roughly 25% cheaper on typical workloads and up to 45% cheaper on agentic ones. 1M context, 128K output, adaptive thinking always on.
Anthropic's new Mythos-class flagship and the most capable coding model anyone can use — 80.3% SWE-Bench Pro, an 11-point jump over Opus 4.8. 1M context, 128K output, native parallel subagents. Released June 9, 2026.
Pricing moves, ranking shifts, and capability updates.
Anthropic released Claude Opus 5.5 on September 22, 2026. Its launch table reports 89.9% on SWE-bench Pro, ahead of Claude Fable 5.1 (81.2%) and Opus 5 (79.2%), and 93.9% on SWE-bench Multilingual. The price fell from Opus 5's $5/$25 to $4/$20 per million tokens, with cache reads at $0.20, and Anthropic says it spends fewer tokens per finished task. It is not ahead on every row: Opus 5 still scores higher on Toolathlon Verified (80.6% vs 77.8%), and its Terminal-Bench 4.0 result depends on the effort setting (66.4% at xhigh, 64.8% at max). Context is 1M tokens with 128K output; Fast mode costs $8/$40. Opus 5.5 is now the top coding pick across the directory. Verified October 10, 2026.
View modelClaude Opus 5.5 costs $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens on the API, with cached input at $0.2 per million. A month of 10M input and 2M output tokens runs about $80.00 at list price, before any batch or caching discounts.
Claude Opus 5.5 has a 1M tokens context window, with up to 128k tokens of output per response. That is the total of prompt plus response the model can hold in one request.
Claude Opus 5.5's training data runs through June 2026, and the model was released on September 22, 2026. For anything after that date it needs web search or documents in the prompt.
Claude Opus 5.5 is best for agentic coding, long-running agents and knowledge work where opus 5 was the bar. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around premium pricing and deliberate speed.
Your tasks are well-scoped and latency-sensitive — Sonnet 5.5 is half the price and Anthropic says it is the fastest Sonnet yet.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) at $2.00/1M/1M input against Claude Opus 5.5's $4.00/1M/1M — roughly 50% less per token all in. Near-Opus 5.5 quality on scoped work at half the price. Compare it first if Claude Opus 5.5's pricing is the thing stopping you.
Claude Fable 5.1 — deliberate against Claude Opus 5.5's deliberate, with 1M tokens of context. Worth the swap when response time is what your users notice rather than the last few points of reasoning depth.
Newsletter
We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.
No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.
No reviews yet — be the first.