Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7, released September 21, 2026, targets coding and professional knowledge work over multi-hour tasks, with better self-verification and long-context handling than Grok 4.6 at the same $2/$6 price.
Finishes agent tasks in half the turns — cheap where it counts.
Long-running agents and multi-step codebase work
You need a published SWE-bench score to justify the pick, or your prompts routinely cross 200K tokens where the price doubles.
Compare every model's knowledge cutoff, max output, and context window.
Released August 12, 2026, succeeding Grok 4.5. Long-context billing is a cliff, not a ramp: at 200K tokens and above the whole request is charged at $4/$12. DeepSWE 65.9%, CursorBench 3.2 70.8%, FrontierCode 1.1 Extended 61.3%, Terminal-Bench 3.0 26.5%, APEX-Agents 57.5%.
Roughly half the turns of competing models on agent tasks — real cost per completed task lands well below the sticker price
88.4% on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and 87.0% on VulcanBench v3
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of 61, 4th overall and within reach of Claude Opus 5
No published SWE-bench Verified or SWE-bench Pro figure, so it cannot be compared directly on the standard coding leaderboard
GPT-5.6 Sol Max beats it on DeepSWE v1.1 and Terminal-Bench 3.0
Prompts of 200K tokens or more are billed at $4/$12 across the entire request, not just the overage
What people actually use Grok 4.6 for.
Long-horizon research agents that work a topic across many sequential steps
Working through an unfamiliar codebase over an extended agent session
Interactive and visual work where turn count drives the real bill
The nearest models people weigh against it, and what actually separates them.
vs Grok 4.7 — Against Grok 4.7 (xAI), Grok 4.6 lands within a few percent on price. Which one wins depends on whether context depth or latency is your constraint.
vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet — Against Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Anthropic), Grok 4.6 runs about 78% cheaper per token, takes 2.5x the context and answers faster. Take Grok 4.6 unless you specifically need what Claude 3.5 Sonnet does better.
vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) — Against Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) (Anthropic), Grok 4.6 runs about 56% cheaper per token, takes 2.5x the context and answers faster. Take Grok 4.6 unless you specifically need what Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) does better.
Price History
→0% since Sep 1
43 data points · tracked daily since Sep 1, 2026
Long-running agents and multi-step codebase work. Start free — no card required.
Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.
Similar models worth checking before you commit.
Grok 4.7, released September 21, 2026, targets coding and professional knowledge work over multi-hour tasks, with better self-verification and long-context handling than Grok 4.6 at the same $2/$6 price.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is Anthropic's mid-cycle flagship model, balancing strong reasoning, coding, and instruction-following with a 200K context window. It sits between Haiku and Opus in Anthropic's lineup, offering near-flagship quality at a lower cost than top-tier models.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet with extended thinking enabled — Anthropic's hybrid reasoning model that explicitly deliberates before responding, surfacing its chain-of-thought for complex multi-step problems. It sits between standard Sonnet and full reasoning-only models, balancing depth with practical usability.
Grok 4.6 costs $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens on the API, with cached input at $0.5 per million. A month of 10M input and 2M output tokens runs about $32.00 at list price, before any batch or caching discounts.
Grok 4.6 has a 500k tokens context window, with up to 500k tokens of output per response. That is the total of prompt plus response the model can hold in one request.
Grok 4.6's training data runs through February 1, 2026, and the model was released on August 12, 2026. For anything after that date it needs web search or documents in the prompt.
Grok 4.6 is best for long-running agents and multi-step codebase work. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around balanced pricing and fast speed.
You need a published SWE-bench score to justify the pick, or your prompts routinely cross 200K tokens where the price doubles.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) at $2.00/1M/1M input against Grok 4.6's $2.00/1M/1M. Near-Opus 5.5 quality on scoped work at half the price. Compare it first if Grok 4.6's pricing is the thing stopping you.
Grok 4.7 — fast against Grok 4.6's fast, with 500k tokens of context. Worth the swap when response time is what your users notice rather than the last few points of reasoning depth.
Newsletter
We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.
No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.
No reviews yet — be the first.