UseRightAI
HomeModelsAsk AIComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAICut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

Opus 4.8 vs Opus 4.7Fable 5 vs Opus 4.8New AI Models 2026ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTAll comparisons →Build your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

HomeModelsGrok 4.5
xAIBalanced

Grok 4.5

Best cost-per-solved-task coding agent — efficiency over ceiling.

94
Coding
72
Writing
84
Research
80
Images
62
Value
78
Long Context
Use this when

Fast, token-efficient coding agents

Skip this if

You need the highest solve rate per attempt or verified low hallucination — Claude Opus 5 is the safer premium pick.

Pricing
$2.00/1M in
$6.00/1M out
Context
500k tokens
Speed
Fast

Released July 8, 2026 on the 1.5T-parameter V9 base. Pricing verified on docs.x.ai: $2/$6 under 200K prompt tokens, $4/$12 above. Full access initially gated to SuperGrok Heavy; staged rollout to SuperGrok $30 tier. EU availability lagged launch.

How to access
API
$2/1M input tokens
Subscription = chat interface. API = build with it. Compare all subscription plans
Switch to instead if...
Best overall
Claude Fable 5
Cheaper option
Mistral: Mistral Nemo

Strengths

Top SWE Marathon score at 29% pass@1 — beats Claude Opus 4.8 (26%) and Fable 5 (24%) on long sessions

Exceptional token efficiency: ~16K output tokens per SWE-bench Pro task, ~4.2x fewer than Opus 4.8

$2/$6 per 1M — roughly 60–80% cheaper per solved task than Opus-class and GPT-5.6-class rivals

Weaknesses

Raw ceiling trails the frontier: 64.7% SWE-bench Pro vs Opus 4.8's 69.2%, with a higher reported hallucination rate

500K context is half the frontier norm, and rates double at ≥200K prompt tokens

Real-world use cases

What people actually use Grok 4.5 for.

Long-session software engineering — top SWE Marathon score (29% pass@1, ahead of Opus 4.8 and Fable 5)

Cost-controlled coding agents — ~4.2x fewer output tokens per solved SWE task than Opus 4.8

Live web/X-grounded coding and research with built-in search tools

Ready to try it?

Start using Grok 4.5

Fast, token-efficient coding agents. Start free — no card required.

Try Grok 4.5 freeCompare alternatives

Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.

Grok 4.5 head-to-head

All Grok 4.5 alternatives →Grok 4.5 vs Grok 4 →Grok 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5 →Grok 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol →View benchmark scores →

FAQ

What is Grok 4.5 best for?

Grok 4.5 is best for fast, token-efficient coding agents. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around balanced pricing and fast speed.

When should I avoid Grok 4.5?

You need the highest solve rate per attempt or verified low hallucination — Claude Opus 5 is the safer premium pick.

What is a cheaper alternative to Grok 4.5?

Mistral: Mistral Nemo is the lower-cost option to compare first when you want a similar workflow fit with less token spend.

What is a faster alternative to Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5 is the better pick when response time matters more than maximum depth or premium quality.

Newsletter

Get notified when Grok 4.5 pricing changes

We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.

No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.

User reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.