UseRightAI
HomeModelsAsk AIComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAICut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

Opus 4.8 vs Opus 4.7Fable 5 vs Opus 4.8New AI Models 2026ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTAll comparisons →Build your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

HomeModelsGPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAIBudget

GPT-5.6 Luna

Best budget model from a frontier lab — near-frontier scores at commodity price.

88
Coding
85
Writing
84
Research
80
Images
95
Value
58
Long Context
Use this when

Cheap high-throughput summarization, drafting, and routine agent steps

Skip this if

Your workload actually uses the long context window — recall drops to 41% past 512K tokens.

Pricing
$0.20/1M in
$1.20/1M out
Context
1.1M tokens
Speed
Fast

Fully public July 9, 2026; price cut ~80% to $0.20/$1.20 on July 30, 2026 (launched at $1/$6). Many third-party pages still show the old price.

How to access
API
$0.2/1M input tokens
Subscription = chat interface. API = build with it. Compare all subscription plans
Switch to instead if...
Best overall
Claude Fable 5
Cheaper option
Mistral: Mistral Nemo

Strengths

Punches far above its price: GPQA Diamond 92.3%, SWE-bench Pro 62.7%, Terminal-Bench 2.1 84.7%

$0.20/$1.20 per 1M after the July 30, 2026 price cut — dramatically cheaper per token than Gemini 3.6 Flash

Full 1.05M-token context at budget pricing — larger than most rival small models

Weaknesses

Long-context recall collapses at scale: 41.3% on 512K–1M token tasks vs Terra's 72.5%

Text and image input only — no video, audio, or native PDF ingestion like Gemini 3.6 Flash

Real-world use cases

What people actually use GPT-5.6 Luna for.

High-volume summarization and drafting at $0.20/1M input

Routine steps in agent pipelines where Sol/Terra would be overkill

Budget coding assistance — 62.7% SWE-bench Pro within ~2 points of Sol at 1/25th the output cost

Ready to try it?

Start using GPT-5.6 Luna

Cheap high-throughput summarization, drafting, and routine agent steps. Start free — no card required.

Try GPT-5.6 Luna freeCompare alternatives

Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.

GPT-5.6 Luna head-to-head

All GPT-5.6 Luna alternatives →GPT-5.6 Luna vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite →GPT-5.6 Luna vs DeepSeek V4-Flash →View benchmark scores →

FAQ

What is GPT-5.6 Luna best for?

GPT-5.6 Luna is best for cheap high-throughput summarization, drafting, and routine agent steps. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around budget pricing and fast speed.

When should I avoid GPT-5.6 Luna?

Your workload actually uses the long context window — recall drops to 41% past 512K tokens.

What is a cheaper alternative to GPT-5.6 Luna?

Mistral: Mistral Nemo is the lower-cost option to compare first when you want a similar workflow fit with less token spend.

What is a faster alternative to GPT-5.6 Luna?

GPT-5.6 Luna is the better pick when response time matters more than maximum depth or premium quality.

Newsletter

Get notified when GPT-5.6 Luna pricing changes

We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.

No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.

User reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.