UseRightAI
HomeModelsAsk AIComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAICut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

Opus 4.8 vs Opus 4.7Fable 5 vs Opus 4.8New AI Models 2026ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTAll comparisons →Build your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

HomeModelsClaude Opus 5
AnthropicPremium

Claude Opus 5

Best premium model for agentic coding — near-Fable 5 quality at half the price.

100
Coding
96
Writing
98
Research
88
Images
26
Value
98
Long Context
Use this when

Complex agentic coding and enterprise agent workflows

Skip this if

You need fast interactive latency (Sonnet 5 is quicker and one-fifth the price) or absolute frontier ceiling (Fable 5).

Pricing
$5.00/1M in
$25.00/1M out
Context
1M tokens
Speed
Deliberate

Released July 24, 2026 at Opus 4.8's exact pricing. 1M context at standard rates, 128K max output. Anthropic's alignment audit calls it their most aligned model to date. Default model on Claude Max plans.

How to access
API
$5/1M input tokens
Subscription = chat interface. API = build with it. Compare all subscription plans
Switch to instead if...
Best overall
Claude Fable 5
Cheaper option
Mistral: Mistral Nemo

Strengths

Leads SWE-bench Verified at ~96% — the top public coding score as of August 2026

89.1% on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and state-of-the-art on Frontier-Bench v0.1, more than doubling Opus 4.8's result

Within 0.5% of Claude Fable 5 on CursorBench 3.2 at half the cost per task

Weaknesses

Still short of Claude Fable 5's absolute frontier ceiling on the hardest long-running agent tasks

Fast mode (research preview) doubles pricing to $10/$50, erasing the cost advantage over Fable 5

Real-world use cases

What people actually use Claude Opus 5 for.

Long-running repository-level engineering with the top SWE-bench Verified score (~96%)

Autonomous computer-use agents — beats Fable 5's best OSWorld 2.0 result at one-third the cost

Enterprise automation where Opus 4.8 quality was the bar and price capped Fable 5 adoption

Ready to try it?

Start using Claude Opus 5

Complex agentic coding and enterprise agent workflows. Start free — no card required.

Try Claude Opus 5 freeCompare alternatives

Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.

Claude Opus 5 head-to-head

All Claude Opus 5 alternatives →Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8 →Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5 →Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol →Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 →Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro →Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3 →Grok 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5 →View benchmark scores →

FAQ

What is Claude Opus 5 best for?

Claude Opus 5 is best for complex agentic coding and enterprise agent workflows. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around premium pricing and deliberate speed.

When should I avoid Claude Opus 5?

You need fast interactive latency (Sonnet 5 is quicker and one-fifth the price) or absolute frontier ceiling (Fable 5).

What is a cheaper alternative to Claude Opus 5?

Mistral: Mistral Nemo is the lower-cost option to compare first when you want a similar workflow fit with less token spend.

What is a faster alternative to Claude Opus 5?

Claude Opus 5 is the better pick when response time matters more than maximum depth or premium quality.

Newsletter

Get notified when Claude Opus 5 pricing changes

We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.

No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.

User reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.