UseRightAI
UseRightAI logo
HomeModelsComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAI
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.
UseRightAI logo
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTBuild your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

Model Comparison

Compare AI models side by side

Pick up to 3 models and compare input cost, output cost, context window, speed, and more. The best value in each row is highlighted. Share your comparison with a link.

What to compare next

Top coding modelsBudget vs balancedThe three big defaultsBudget picks
 
MistralBudget
Codestral 25.01

Best budget-focused coding specialist for high-volume developer teams.

GoogleBudget
Gemini 3.1 Flash

Best cheap AI for broad day-to-day work — now with 1M context.

AnthropicBudget
Claude 4 Haiku

Best low-cost writing option for fast-moving content teams.

Input cost / 1M tokens$0.90/1M$0.50/1M$0.80/1M
Output cost / 1M tokens$2.70/1M$3.00/1M$4.00/1M
Context window256k tokens1M tokens200k tokens
SpeedVery fastVery fastVery fast
Price tierBudgetBudgetBudget
Best forAffordable high-volume coding supportHigh-volume everyday AI usage where speed and cost both matterFast budget writing, support automation, and cost-sensitive Anthropic integrations
Last verifiedTodayTodayToday
VerdictThe sharpest cheap coding specialist when cost control is part of the engineering plan.The best all-around budget model for most teams. Faster than its predecessor, cheaper, and with a 1M context window that outclasses every other budget option.The best pick when you want Anthropic quality at a budget price point — especially for writing-heavy automations.
View full profileTry Codestral 25.01
View full profileTry Gemini 3.1 Flash
View full profileTry Claude 4 Haiku
MistralBudget

Codestral 25.01

Best budget-focused coding specialist for high-volume developer teams.

Input cost / 1M tokens
$0.90/1M
Output cost / 1M tokens✓ best
$2.70/1M
Context window
256k tokens
Speed
Very fast
Price tier
Budget

The sharpest cheap coding specialist when cost control is part of the engineering plan.

Full profileTry Codestral 25.01
GoogleBudget

Gemini 3.1 Flash

Best cheap AI for broad day-to-day work — now with 1M context.

Input cost / 1M tokens✓ best
$0.50/1M
Output cost / 1M tokens
$3.00/1M
Context window✓ best
1M tokens
Speed
Very fast
Price tier
Budget

The best all-around budget model for most teams. Faster than its predecessor, cheaper, and with a 1M context window that outclasses every other budget option.

Full profileTry Gemini 3.1 Flash
AnthropicBudget

Claude 4 Haiku

Best low-cost writing option for fast-moving content teams.

Input cost / 1M tokens
$0.80/1M
Output cost / 1M tokens
$4.00/1M
Context window
200k tokens
Speed
Very fast
Price tier
Budget

The best pick when you want Anthropic quality at a budget price point — especially for writing-heavy automations.

Full profileTry Claude 4 Haiku

Share this comparison

Tweet