UseRightAI
UseRightAI logo
HomeModelsComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAI
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.
UseRightAI logo
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTBuild your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

Model Comparison

Compare AI models side by side

Pick up to 3 models and compare input cost, output cost, context window, speed, and more. The best value in each row is highlighted. Share your comparison with a link.

What to compare next

Top coding modelsBudget vs balancedThe three big defaultsBudget picks
 
AnthropicPremium
Claude Opus 4.6

Previous Opus flagship, now superseded by Claude Opus 4.7.

AnthropicPremium
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Best daily driver for coding and writing — the model most developers actually reach for.

OpenAIPremium
GPT-5.4

Best for agentic automation and desktop control workflows.

Input cost / 1M tokens$15.00/1M$3.00/1M$2.50/1M
Output cost / 1M tokens$75.00/1M$15.00/1M$15.00/1M
Context window1M tokens1M tokens272k tokens
SpeedDeliberateBalancedBalanced
Price tierPremiumPremiumPremium
Best forAgentic coding, complex multi-step reasoning, and deep researchDaily coding, writing, and long-document work at a strong price-to-quality ratioAgentic workflows, desktop automation, and complex multi-step reasoning
Last verifiedTodayTodayToday
VerdictStill strong for high-stakes engineering work, but Opus 4.7 is the newer premium coding leader. For most teams, Sonnet 4.6 remains the smarter lower-cost default.The best all-around model for most developers and writers. Strong SWE-bench, excellent writing, 1M context — all at $3/1M input. Hard to beat as a daily driver.Best choice when you need a model that can operate software autonomously at the older GPT-5.4 price tier. For current premium coding quality, Claude Opus 4.7 leads.
View full profileTry Claude Opus 4.6
View full profileTry Claude Sonnet 4.6
View full profileTry GPT-5.4
AnthropicPremium

Claude Opus 4.6

Previous Opus flagship, now superseded by Claude Opus 4.7.

Input cost / 1M tokens
$15.00/1M
Output cost / 1M tokens
$75.00/1M
Context window✓ best
1M tokens
Speed
Deliberate
Price tier
Premium

Still strong for high-stakes engineering work, but Opus 4.7 is the newer premium coding leader. For most teams, Sonnet 4.6 remains the smarter lower-cost default.

Full profileTry Claude Opus 4.6
AnthropicPremium

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Best daily driver for coding and writing — the model most developers actually reach for.

Input cost / 1M tokens
$3.00/1M
Output cost / 1M tokens✓ best
$15.00/1M
Context window✓ best
1M tokens
Speed✓ best
Balanced
Price tier
Premium

The best all-around model for most developers and writers. Strong SWE-bench, excellent writing, 1M context — all at $3/1M input. Hard to beat as a daily driver.

Full profileTry Claude Sonnet 4.6
OpenAIPremium

GPT-5.4

Best for agentic automation and desktop control workflows.

Input cost / 1M tokens✓ best
$2.50/1M
Output cost / 1M tokens✓ best
$15.00/1M
Context window
272k tokens
Speed✓ best
Balanced
Price tier
Premium

Best choice when you need a model that can operate software autonomously at the older GPT-5.4 price tier. For current premium coding quality, Claude Opus 4.7 leads.

Full profileTry GPT-5.4

Share this comparison

Tweet