Muse Spark is Meta's best model for writing — it scores 88/100 vs 66/100 for Llama 4 Maverick, at $1.25/1M input tokens. Across all providers, Claude Fable 5 still leads writing at 98/100 — worth considering if you're not committed to Meta.
The shortest way to see the safest default, the lower-cost option, and the specialist pick before you read deeper.
Muse Spark is the safest overall answer here when you want the strongest default instead of the lowest list price.
Meta: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is the lower-cost option to start with when you still need useful output at scale.
Llama 4 Maverick is the better pick when response speed matters more than maximum reasoning depth.
Muse Spark leads Meta's lineup for writing at 88/100 ($1.25/1M input, 1.048576M context).
Llama 4 Scout is the value pick at $0.5/1M input with a writing score of 60/100.
Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) is the overall writing leader at 98/100 if provider choice is open.
Choose Muse Spark when writing quality is the priority and you're staying on Meta.
Choose Llama 4 Scout when token volume matters more than peak quality.
Teams open to other providers should also evaluate Claude Fable 5 before committing.
Switch the scoring lens to see whether the top answer changes when you care more about cost, speed, or long-document work.
Meta / Balanced / Aug 6, 2026
Best-value multimodal agentic model — GPT-5.5-tier smarts, video/audio/PDF in.
Ranks models by the broadest mix of coding, writing, research, and long-context usefulness.
You need frontier-ceiling reasoning or a mature developer ecosystem — Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 lead both.
The fastest way to see where the recommendation shifts when your priority changes.
Best-value multimodal agentic model — GPT-5.5-tier smarts, video/audio/PDF in.
Best flexible option for teams that need open-weight portability.
Best open-weight long-context option for self-hosted pipelines.
Muse Spark 1.2 scores 80% on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and ranks #5 overall on GDPval-AA v2 (Elo 1631), ahead of Claude Opus 4.8 on agentic tasks
Natively multimodal in: text, image, video, audio, and PDF — broader input support than most rivals
$1.25/$4.25 per 1M tokens — among the most cost-efficient models at its intelligence level (~$0.40/task)
Trails the frontier on raw intelligence: AA Intelligence Index 54 vs Claude Opus 5 (61) and GPT-5.6 Sol (59)
Weak on some hard agentic evals (27% tau3-Banking) and the API ecosystem is young — public API only since July 2026
UseRightAI recommendations are based on practical decision factors people actually feel in day-to-day use.
Newsletter
Useful if you care about ranking shifts, pricing changes, or a better recommendation appearing in this decision path.
No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.
Muse Spark — it scores 88/100 on writing in this directory, ahead of Llama 4 Maverick at 66/100. Best-value multimodal agentic model — GPT-5.5-tier smarts, video/audio/PDF in.
Not overall. Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) leads the directory for writing at 98/100 vs Muse Spark's 88/100. Muse Spark is the best pick if you're staying within Meta's ecosystem.
Llama 4 Scout at $0.5/1M input tokens (writing score: 60/100). Use it for volume work and reserve Muse Spark for the tasks where quality matters most.
$1.25/1M input tokens and $4.25/1M output tokens via the API, or through Meta AI (free) at $0/mo for chat use. Context window: 1.048576M tokens.