Muse Spark
Meta Superintelligence Labs' first closed frontier model — a natively multimodal agentic reasoner (text, image, video, audio, PDF in) with a parallel-agent 'Contemplating mode', priced aggressively below rivals.
Apache 2.0 agent model that runs on a 24GB GPU.
Local and self-hosted agents that run continuously
You need a large context window or the strongest agent scores at this size — check Qwen's 27B first.
Compare every model's knowledge cutoff, max output, and context window.
Released August 9, 2026 — the first model from Meta Superintelligence Labs and Meta's return to a genuinely permissive licence. No Meta API price; hosted rates from third parties such as Together and OpenRouter land around $0.35/$1.50. Local hardware targets: 24GB for K-Quant-17GB, 32GB for K-Quant-Dynamic, 64GB for full precision.
76.0% on SWE-bench Verified — strong for a 30B dense model
Apache 2.0 licence with no restrictions on commercial use, modification or redistribution
Designed for long tool-call chains and failure recovery, with multimodal input and reasoning
Qwen3.6-27B beats it on several practical agent and multimodal tests in Meta's own comparison table
Meta publishes no first-party API price — you pay a third-party host or run it yourself
131K context is small next to the 1M-token field
What people actually use Muse Glimmer 30B for.
Always-on local agents that make many sequential tool calls and must recover from failures
Commercial products that need unrestricted weights — Apache 2.0, no usage caps or redistribution limits
Running a capable agent model on a single 24GB or 32GB GPU via quantisation
The nearest models people weigh against it, and what actually separates them.
vs Muse Spark — Against Muse Spark (Meta), Muse Glimmer 30B runs about 66% cheaper per token, gives up 8x on context and answers faster. Take Muse Glimmer 30B unless you specifically need what Muse Spark does better.
vs GPT-6 Astra — Against GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI), Muse Glimmer 30B runs about 97% cheaper per token, gives up 8x on context and answers faster. Take Muse Glimmer 30B unless you specifically need what GPT-6 Astra does better.
vs Claude Fable 5.1 — Against Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic), Muse Glimmer 30B runs about 97% cheaper per token, gives up 7.6x on context and answers faster. Take Muse Glimmer 30B unless you specifically need what Claude Fable 5.1 does better.
Price History
→0% since Sep 1
7 data points · tracked daily since Sep 1, 2026
Local and self-hosted agents that run continuously. Start free — no card required.
Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.
Similar models worth checking before you commit.
Meta Superintelligence Labs' first closed frontier model — a natively multimodal agentic reasoner (text, image, video, audio, PDF in) with a parallel-agent 'Contemplating mode', priced aggressively below rivals.
OpenAI's September 3, 2026 frontier release — the first GPT-6 model and OpenAI's answer to Claude Fable 5.1 two days earlier. State of the art on computer use (OSWorld 2.0 72.6% in ~47% less time than GPT-5.6 Sol), agentic coding (Terminal-Bench 4.0 57.9%), and frontier math (FrontierMath Tier 4 97.6%). $10/$50 per 1M tokens, 1.05M context, 128K output, knowledge cutoff April 30, 2026.
Anthropic's September 1, 2026 frontier release and the new capability ceiling for coding, agents, and scientific work. Base pricing is unchanged at $10/$50, but cache reads dropped 75% to $0.25/1M — roughly 25% cheaper on typical workloads and up to 45% cheaper on agentic ones. 1M context, 128K output, adaptive thinking always on.
Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.5 per million output tokens on the API. A month of 10M input and 2M output tokens runs about $6.50 at list price, before any batch or caching discounts.
Muse Glimmer 30B has a 131k tokens context window, with up to 131k tokens of output per response. That is the total of prompt plus response the model can hold in one request.
Muse Glimmer 30B's training data runs through January 4, 2026, and the model was released on August 10, 2026. For anything after that date it needs web search or documents in the prompt.
Muse Glimmer 30B is best for local and self-hosted agents that run continuously. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around budget pricing and fast speed.
You need a large context window or the strongest agent scores at this size — check Qwen's 27B first.
Grok 4.5 (xAI) at $2.00/1M/1M input against Muse Glimmer 30B's $0.35/1M/1M. Best cost-per-solved-task coding agent — efficiency over ceiling. Compare it first if Muse Glimmer 30B's pricing is the thing stopping you.
Muse Spark — balanced against Muse Glimmer 30B's fast, with 1.0M tokens of context. Worth the swap when response time is what your users notice rather than the last few points of reasoning depth.
Newsletter
We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.
No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.
No reviews yet — be the first.