UseRightAI
HomeModelsAsk AIComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAICut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

Opus 4.8 vs Opus 4.7Fable 5 vs Opus 4.8New AI Models 2026ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTAll comparisons →Build your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

HomeModelsMistral Medium 3.5
MistralBalanced

Mistral Medium 3.5

Best self-hostable multimodal model — European, dense, MIT-licensed.

91
Coding
84
Writing
82
Research
84
Images
64
Value
74
Long Context
Use this when

Self-hostable European multimodal coding

Skip this if

API price-performance is all that matters — DeepSeek V4-Pro is stronger and cheaper hosted.

Pricing
$1.50/1M in
$7.50/1M out
Context
256k tokens
Speed
Balanced

Released April 29, 2026 (model ID mistral-medium-3-5-26-04). Pricing verified on docs.mistral.ai. Le Chat Pro $14.99/mo does not include API usage.

How to access
API
$1.5/1M input tokens
Subscription = chat interface. API = build with it. Compare all subscription plans
Switch to instead if...
Best overall
Claude Fable 5
Cheaper option
Mistral: Mistral Nemo

Strengths

77.6% SWE-bench Verified — the strongest dense open-weights coding score at release

Single-checkpoint multimodality with function calling and structured outputs

Open weights under a modified MIT license, practical to self-host and fine-tune at 128B dense

Weaknesses

Trails GPT-5.6, Opus-class, and Gemini frontier models on complex multi-step reasoning; sparse published benchmark disclosure

256K context is a quarter of the 1M frontier norm, and $7.50/1M output is dear for the tier

Real-world use cases

What people actually use Mistral Medium 3.5 for.

Coding at 77.6% SWE-bench Verified — within ~2 points of Claude Sonnet 4.6 at roughly half the price

Document Q&A and vision tasks from a single checkpoint with structured outputs

EU-compliant self-hosted deployments — 128B dense is far easier to run than trillion-parameter MoE rivals

Ready to try it?

Start using Mistral Medium 3.5

Self-hostable European multimodal coding. Start free — no card required.

Try Mistral Medium 3.5 freeCompare alternatives

Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.

Mistral Medium 3.5 head-to-head

All Mistral Medium 3.5 alternatives →Mistral Medium 3.5 vs DeepSeek V4-Pro →View benchmark scores →

FAQ

What is Mistral Medium 3.5 best for?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is best for self-hostable european multimodal coding. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around balanced pricing and balanced speed.

When should I avoid Mistral Medium 3.5?

API price-performance is all that matters — DeepSeek V4-Pro is stronger and cheaper hosted.

What is a cheaper alternative to Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral: Mistral Nemo is the lower-cost option to compare first when you want a similar workflow fit with less token spend.

What is a faster alternative to Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the better pick when response time matters more than maximum depth or premium quality.

Newsletter

Get notified when Mistral Medium 3.5 pricing changes

We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.

No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.

User reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.