UseRightAI
HomeModelsAsk AIComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAICut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

Opus 4.8 vs Opus 4.7Fable 5 vs Opus 4.8New AI Models 2026ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTAll comparisons →Build your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

HomeModelsGLM-5.2
Z.aiBudget

GLM-5.2

Top open-weights coder — beats GPT-5.5 at a sixth of the cost.

90
Coding
78
Writing
80
Research
40
Images
84
Value
86
Long Context
Use this when

Budget agentic coding at scale

Skip this if

You need frontier reasoning ceiling or launch-day verified benchmarks.

Pricing
$1.40/1M in
$4.40/1M out
Context
1M tokens
Speed
Balanced

Announced June 13, 2026; pay-per-token API live June 16. Two reasoning modes ('thinking' and 'max thinking'). GLM Coding Plan: Lite $18/mo (~$12.60 effective yearly), Pro $72, Max $160.

How to access
API
$1.4/1M input tokens
Subscription = chat interface. API = build with it. Compare all subscription plans
Switch to instead if...
Best overall
Claude Fable 5
Cheaper option
Mistral: Mistral Nemo

Strengths

SWE-bench Pro 62.1 — ahead of GPT-5.5 and close to Claude Opus 4.8 on agentic coding

AA Intelligence Index 51 in max-thinking mode — well above similar-size open-weight models

MIT-licensed weights with aggressive pricing: $1.40/$4.40 first-party, cheaper via third-party hosts

Weaknesses

Clear gap to the closed frontier: AA Index 51 vs Claude Opus 5 (61) and GPT-5.6 Sol (59)

Z.ai published no benchmark numbers at launch — buyers depended on third-party evals that arrived weeks later

Real-world use cases

What people actually use GLM-5.2 for.

Agentic coding — 62.1 SWE-bench Pro, ahead of GPT-5.5 at ~1/6th the price

Coding-plan subscriptions from ~$12.60/mo effective for individual developers

Self-hosted or third-party-hosted deployments (DeepInfra from ~$0.75/1M input)

Ready to try it?

Start using GLM-5.2

Budget agentic coding at scale. Start free — no card required.

Try GLM-5.2 freeCompare alternatives

Recommendations are made independently based on real-world use and public benchmarks. See our disclosures for details.

GLM-5.2 head-to-head

All GLM-5.2 alternatives →DeepSeek V4-Pro vs GLM-5.2 →GLM-5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 Code →View benchmark scores →

FAQ

What is GLM-5.2 best for?

GLM-5.2 is best for budget agentic coding at scale. It is a strong fit when that workflow matters more than the tradeoffs around budget pricing and balanced speed.

When should I avoid GLM-5.2?

You need frontier reasoning ceiling or launch-day verified benchmarks.

What is a cheaper alternative to GLM-5.2?

Mistral: Mistral Nemo is the lower-cost option to compare first when you want a similar workflow fit with less token spend.

What is a faster alternative to GLM-5.2?

GLM-5.2 is the better pick when response time matters more than maximum depth or premium quality.

Newsletter

Get notified when GLM-5.2 pricing changes

We track pricing daily. When this model drops or spikes, you'll know first.

No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.

User reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.