UseRightAI
UseRightAI logo
HomeModelsComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAI
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.
UseRightAI logo
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTBuild your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

Head-to-head · Updated May 2026

Data verified May 2026

GPT-5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

GPT-5.5 is the stronger OpenAI coding and agentic workflow pick. Gemini 3.1 Pro remains the better long-context research value with a larger 2M context window in the catalog and lower input pricing. Choose GPT-5.5 for coding agents and OpenAI-native workflows. Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro for very large research inputs, document synthesis, and cost-sensitive long-context work.

OpenAIPremium

GPT-5.5

Best OpenAI flagship for agentic coding, research, and computer-use work.

VS
GooglePremium

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Best for research and deep document analysis — 2M context at the best premium price.

At a glance

GPT-5.5Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input cost / 1M tokens$$30.00/1M$$2.00/1M
Output cost / 1M tokens$$180.00/1M$$12.00/1M
Context window1M tokens2M tokens
SpeedBalancedBalanced
Price tierPremiumPremium
Benchmarks
SWE-bench (coding)—63.2%
Arena Elo—1,380
MMLU—90%

How they compare

Which model wins for each use case — and why.

Coding agentsGPT-5.5 wins

GPT-5.5 is OpenAI's newest premium coding and agentic model, with strong SWE-Bench Pro and Terminal-Bench results.

Research contextGemini 3.1 Pro wins

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a larger listed context window at 2M tokens vs GPT-5.5's 1M, which matters for very large corpora.

PriceGemini 3.1 Pro wins

Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper per input token in the catalog, making it easier to justify for high-volume research workloads.

EcosystemTie

GPT-5.5 wins for OpenAI/Codex workflows. Gemini wins for Google Workspace and long-context Google-native use cases.

Which should you pick?

Pick GPT-5.5 if…

  • You need OpenAI's newest premium model
  • Your work is coding-heavy or agent-heavy
  • Your product already depends on OpenAI APIs
View GPT-5.5 details

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro if…

  • You need the largest context window in this pairing
  • You process long research documents or large archives
  • Input-token price matters at scale
View Gemini 3.1 Pro details

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro better?

GPT-5.5 is better for OpenAI-native coding and agent workflows. Gemini 3.1 Pro is better for very large research inputs and lower-cost long-context processing.

Which has the larger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Pro has the larger listed context window at 2M tokens. GPT-5.5 is listed at 1M tokens.

Which is better for coding?

GPT-5.5 is the better choice for coding agents and OpenAI/Codex workflows. Gemini can code, but this pairing favors GPT-5.5 for engineering work.

Related comparisons

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.5GPT-5.5models/gemini 3 1 proBest AI for Research

Newsletter

Get model updates before your workflow falls behind

Pricing changes, new model releases, and updated recommendations — delivered when it matters.

No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.