GPT-5.2 wins on coding (85 vs 52). Claude 4 Haiku wins on price ($0.8 vs $1.75/1M input). For most workflows, GPT-5.2 is the stronger default — capable but outclassed — gpt-5.4 is now cheaper and better.
The safest GPT-5.2 vs Claude 4 Haiku default, the cheaper option worth trying first, and the specialist pick — before you read the detail below.
GPT-5.2 is the strongest answer here for GPT-5.2 vs Claude 4 Haiku — pick it when quality of output matters more than the $1.75/1M/1M input you pay for it.
Claude 4 Haiku handles the same job for about 70% less per token. Start here and only move up if the output is not good enough.
Claude 4 Haiku is the fastest of these for GPT-5.2 vs Claude 4 Haiku — worth it when latency is what the reader notices, not the last few points of reasoning depth.
GPT-5.2 leads on coding with a score of 85 vs 52 for Claude 4 Haiku.
Claude 4 Haiku is cheaper at $0.8/1M input tokens vs $1.75/1M for GPT-5.2.
GPT-5.2 is the stronger default for coding tasks.
Go with GPT-5.2 if you want one model to handle coding and research — it targets serious coding and complex product work.
Switch to Claude 4 Haiku when your work is mostly fast budget writing and support automation; on that narrower brief it is the better tool.
Claude 4 Haiku is the more cost-efficient option at $0.8/1M input — GPT-5.2 costs 2x more per input token, so the gap is worth taking seriously wherever token volume rather than peak quality drives the bill.
Switch the scoring lens to see whether the GPT-5.2 vs Claude 4 Haiku answer changes when cost, speed, or long-document depth leads the decision.
OpenAI / Premium / Sep 3, 2026
Capable but outclassed — GPT-5.4 is now cheaper and better.
Ranks models by the broadest mix of coding, writing, research, and long-context usefulness.
You're starting a new project — GPT-5.4 is cheaper and more capable.
Where the GPT-5.2 vs Claude 4 Haiku recommendation shifts once you weigh price or latency differently.
Capable but outclassed — GPT-5.4 is now cheaper and better.
Best low-cost writing option for fast-moving content teams.
List prices and published scores — the numbers this page's pick is built from.
| Model | Input | Output | Est. month | Context | Speed | Coding | Writing | Research |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.2OpenAI | $1.75/1M | $14.00/1M | $46 | 200k tokens | Balanced | 85 | 82 | 84 |
| Claude 4 HaikuAnthropic | $0.80/1M | $4.00/1M | $16 | 200k tokens | Very fast | 52 | 85 | 62 |
Scores out of 100 — how we evaluate models. “Est. month” is 10M in / 2M out at list price: a ceiling, no discounts.
Why each one is on the shortlist for GPT-5.2 vs Claude 4 Haiku, what it is genuinely good at, and where we would steer you away from it.
The default answer for GPT-5.2 vs Claude 4 Haiku — 85/100 on the coding axis, and the model we would start with unless the price below rules it out.
Reliable OpenAI flagship for serious coding and product work — a strong default before GPT-5.4 was released.
You're starting a new project — GPT-5.4 is cheaper and more capable.
Still capable but GPT-5.4 at $2.50/1M input is now cheaper and better. Hard to justify GPT-5.2 at $12/1M for new projects.
Full pricing, benchmark table and release notes on the GPT-5.2 page.
The value option for GPT-5.2 vs Claude 4 Haiku: about 70% less per token than GPT-5.2, at 52/100 on coding. Worth starting here and moving up only if the output disappoints.
Fast and affordable Anthropic option that keeps writing quality surprisingly high for the price.
Cost is your only concern — Gemini 3.1 Flash offers similar value with a larger context window.
The best pick when you want Anthropic quality at a budget price point — especially for writing-heavy automations.
Full pricing, benchmark table and release notes on the Claude 4 Haiku page.
UseRightAI recommendations are based on practical decision factors people actually feel in day-to-day use.
Newsletter
We email when the GPT-5.2 vs Claude 4 Haiku pick changes, when one of these models moves on price, or when something new displaces the current leader.
No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.
GPT-5.2 wins on more of the categories we score — coding, research, reasoning — so it is the better default of the two. Claude 4 Haiku is the better pick when your work is mostly fast budget writing and support automation. Neither is universally "better": GPT-5.2 is aimed at serious coding and complex product work, Claude 4 Haiku at fast budget writing and support automation.
Claude 4 Haiku is cheaper at $0.8/1M input and $4/1M output. GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/1M input and $14/1M output.
Both GPT-5.2 and Claude 4 Haiku have the same 200K context window.
GPT-5.2 is better for coding with a score of 85 vs Claude 4 Haiku's 52 (out of 100). GPT-6 Astra is the overall coding leader in this directory at 100/100.
Claude 4 Haiku is faster with a very fast speed rating (score: 5) vs GPT-5.2's balanced rating (score: 3). Speed matters most for interactive and high-throughput work; for batch jobs the GPT-5.2 latency penalty is usually invisible.
Superseded by GPT-5.4 for most use cases. Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads on both coding and writing quality. Avoid it if you're starting a new project — GPT-5.4 is cheaper and more capable. That is the main case for looking at Claude 4 Haiku instead.
Less strong on deep reasoning and coding than larger models. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is now cheaper with a larger context window. Avoid it if cost is your only concern — Gemini 3.1 Flash offers similar value with a larger context window. Against GPT-5.2 specifically, the gap shows up most on coding (85 vs 52).
Take a moderate workload of 10M input and 2M output tokens a month. GPT-5.2 runs $45.50 (at $1.75/1M in and $14/1M out); Claude 4 Haiku runs $16.00 (at $0.8/1M in and $4/1M out). That is a $29.50/month difference — Claude 4 Haiku is the cheaper of the two at this volume, and the gap scales linearly as you send more. Output tokens dominate the bill on both, so prompt length matters far less than response length.
Yes, and for most teams that beats picking one. A common split is GPT-5.2 for serious coding and complex product work, with Claude 4 Haiku handling fast budget writing and support automation. Routing high-volume, low-stakes calls to Claude 4 Haiku at $0.8/1M and reserving GPT-5.2 for the hard cases is usually the cheapest arrangement that does not cost you quality.