UseRightAI
HomeModelsAsk AIComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAICut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

Opus 4.8 vs Opus 4.7Fable 5 vs Opus 4.8New AI Models 2026ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTAll comparisons →Build your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingCost per TaskPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansPlan Usage LimitsCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?Cheapest AI APIs

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsGuidesEditorial PolicyDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

HomeComparisonsGemini 3.1 Pro vs Grok 4

Head-to-head · Updated October 2026

Data verified October 2026

Gemini vs Grok

Gemini 3.1 Pro and Grok 4 were two of the most capable non-OpenAI, non-Anthropic models in early 2026. Gemini 3.1 Pro has the much larger window (1M tokens against Grok 4's 256K), scored 77.1% on ARC-AGI-2 at launch, is cheaper ($2 vs $3/1M input) and integrates with Google Workspace. Grok 4's edge was real-time X data. xAI retired Grok 4 from its API on May 15, 2026.

GooglePremium

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Google's Pro model — 1M context and native multimodal input at $2/$12.

Winner
VS
xAIBalanced

Grok 4

Retired May 15, 2026 — replaced by Grok 4.6 and Grok 4.7.

At a glance

Gemini 3.1 ProGrok 4
Input cost / 1M tokens$$2.00/1M$$3.00/1M
Output cost / 1M tokens$$12.00/1M$$15.00/1M
Context window1M tokens256k tokens
SpeedBalancedFast
Price tierPremiumBalanced
Benchmarks
SWE-bench (coding)80.6%54%
Arena Elo1,3801,305
MMLU90%87.5%

How they compare

Which model wins for each use case — and why.

ResearchGemini 3.1 Pro wins

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads reasoning benchmarks including ARC-AGI-2 at 77.1% and integrates natively with Google Search for deep research tasks.

Real-time DataGrok 4 wins

Grok 4 has exclusive access to real-time X/Twitter data — no other model can match this for social media analysis, trending topics, and current events.

Context WindowGemini 3.1 Pro wins

Gemini 3.1 Pro has about four times the window: 1M tokens against Grok 4's 256K. Earlier versions of this page said both had 2M; that was wrong.

CodingGemini 3.1 Pro wins

Gemini 3.1 Pro edges Grok 4 on coding benchmarks and has better integration with Google's developer tools and Vertex AI.

PriceGemini 3.1 Pro wins

Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper on both sides: $2/$12 per 1M tokens against Grok 4's $3/$15.

Which should you pick?

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro if…

  • You use Google Workspace, Docs, or Gmail and want native AI integration
  • Research quality and benchmark performance are your priority
  • You're already on Google Cloud or Vertex AI
  • You want the strongest model for document analysis and synthesis
View Gemini 3.1 Pro details

Pick Grok 4 if…

  • Real-time X/Twitter or social media data is important to your work
  • You're an X Premium subscriber and want native Grok integration
  • You are evaluating xAI — and should look at the current Grok 4.7 instead
  • You want a capable model with a distinctive, direct personality
View Grok 4 details

Bottom line

For most workflows, Gemini 3.1 Pro is the stronger choice.

A capable research model and still Google's current Pro tier, but no longer the long-context leader: its 1M-token window matches Claude Opus 5.5 and is slightly below the GPT-6 family's 1.05M. Choose it for Google Workspace integration and multimodal input; for most research, Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol are stronger at a similar price.

The case for each model

What each one is genuinely good at, where it falls down, and when we would steer you away from it.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Overall winnerGoogle

Our overall pick in this comparison. Against Grok 4 it costs about 22% less per token and takes 4x the context.

Google's Pro-tier Gemini 3 model, released in preview on February 19, 2026, with a 1M-token context window, Deep Think reasoning and $2/$12 pricing.

Input
$2.00/1M
Output
$12.00/1M
Context
1M tokens
Speed
Balanced

What people actually use it for

  • Analyzing long contracts, codebases, or research papers in a single 1M-token prompt
  • Due diligence synthesis across large sets of financial documents or legal agreements
  • Multi-step reasoning across dense technical specifications with Deep Think mode

Where it wins

  • 1M-token context window with native image, audio, video and PDF input
  • Scored 77.1% on ARC-AGI-2 at its February 2026 launch
  • $2/$12 per 1M tokens — cheaper output than most premium models

Where it falls down

  • Slower than Flash for everyday lightweight tasks
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 is better for writing quality, at a lower $2/$10

Skip it if

Your primary use case is writing quality or agentic coding — Claude wins both.

Our verdict

A capable research model and still Google's current Pro tier, but no longer the long-context leader: its 1M-token window matches Claude Opus 5.5 and is slightly below the GPT-6 family's 1.05M. Choose it for Google Workspace integration and multimodal input; for most research, Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol are stronger at a similar price.

Full pricing, benchmark table and release notes on the Gemini 3.1 Pro page.

Grok 4

xAI

The runner-up here, but not by a wide margin. Against Gemini 3.1 Pro it costs about 22% more per token and answers faster.

xAI's July 2025 flagship, priced at $3/$15 per million tokens with a 256K context window. Retired from xAI's API on May 15, 2026; current Grok models are Grok 4.6 and Grok 4.7.

Input
$3.00/1M
Output
$15.00/1M
Context
256k tokens
Speed
Fast

What people actually use it for

  • Early-stage research mapping — exploring a new topic before narrowing down
  • Analyzing codebases and datasets within a 256K-token context window
  • Competitive intelligence and market research with broad, fast synthesis

Where it wins

  • Strong coding and reasoning at its July 2025 launch
  • 256K-token context window
  • Fast and responsive for exploration and open-ended research loops

Where it falls down

  • Retired from xAI's API on May 15, 2026
  • Less established ecosystem and tooling than OpenAI or Anthropic

Skip it if

You need the highest writing quality or the most reliable production-grade output — Claude wins both.

Our verdict

Retired: xAI shut down the grok-4-0709 API on May 15, 2026. It was a strong coding model at launch, at $3/$15 with a 256K window; earlier versions of this page listed $2/$6 and 2M tokens in error. Use Grok 4.7 instead.

Full pricing, benchmark table and release notes on the Grok 4 page.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini or Grok better in 2026?

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads on research benchmarks and Google ecosystem integration. Grok 4 is the only model with real-time X/Twitter data. For most users, Gemini is the stronger general-purpose choice.

Do Gemini and Grok have the same context window?

No — Gemini 3.1 Pro's 1M-token window is about four times Grok 4's 256K, so Gemini is the better choice for large document analysis.

Which is cheaper — Gemini or Grok?

Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper: $2/$12 per 1M tokens against Grok 4's $3/$15. Earlier versions of this page listed Grok 4 at $2/$6; that was wrong.

Can Gemini access real-time data?

Gemini can integrate with Google Search for current information. Grok has exclusive real-time access to X/Twitter data. Both have real-time capabilities but from different sources.

Which is better for Google Workspace users?

Gemini 3.1 Pro is built for Google Workspace integration — it works natively in Gmail, Docs, Sheets, and Meet. Grok has no Google integration.

Related comparisons

Comparison
Claude vs GeminiClaude vs Gemini compared on coding, writing, research, context window, speed, and price …Read guide
Comparison
ChatGPT vs GrokChatGPT (GPT-5.4) vs Grok 4 compared on coding, writing, research, context window, price, and…Read guide
Comparison
Grok vs ClaudeGrok 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 compared on coding, writing, context window, price, and…Read guide
Guide
Best AI for ResearchGPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1 lead AI research in October 2026. Compare 1M-token…Read guide

Newsletter

Get model updates before your workflow falls behind

Pricing changes, new model releases, and updated recommendations — delivered when it matters.

No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.