UseRightAI
UseRightAI logo
HomeModelsComparePricingWhat's New
UseRightAI
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.
UseRightAI logo
Cut through AI hype. Pick what works.

Independent AI model tracker. Live pricing, real benchmarks, zero vendor bias.

X (Twitter)LinkedInUpdatesContact

Compare

ChatGPT vs ClaudeGPT-4o vs Claude SonnetClaude vs GeminiDeepSeek vs ChatGPTMistral vs ClaudeGemini Flash vs GPT-4o MiniLlama vs ChatGPTBuild your own →

Best For

CodingWritingDevelopersProduct ManagersDesignersSalesBest Cheap AIBest Free AI

Pricing & Data

API Token PricingPrice HistoryBenchmark ScoresPrivacy & SafetySubscription PlansCost CalculatorWhich AI is Cheapest?

Company

About UseRightAIContactWhat ChangedAll ModelsDisclosuresPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 UseRightAI. Independent · Free forever · Not affiliated with any AI provider.

Affiliate links are clearly labeled. See disclosures.

Head-to-head · Updated June 2026

Data verified June 2026

Claude Mythos 5 vs Claude Fable 5

Claude Mythos 5 and Claude Fable 5 are the same underlying model with identical benchmarks: 80.3% SWE-Bench Pro, 1932 GDPval-AA, 1M-token context, $10/$50 pricing. The only difference is safety and access. Fable 5 ships with safeguards that block specific high-risk cyber responses and is generally available. Mythos 5 lifts those safeguards for advanced security and research work and is restricted to vetted partners. For almost everyone, Fable 5 is the right — and only available — choice.

AnthropicPremium

Claude Fable 5

New global #1 — 80.3% SWE-Bench Pro, the most capable model generally available.

Winner
VS
AnthropicPremium

Claude Mythos 5

The frontier ceiling — same model as Fable 5, safeguards lifted, partner-only.

At a glance

Claude Fable 5Claude Mythos 5
Input cost / 1M tokens$$10.00/1M$$10.00/1M
Output cost / 1M tokens$$50.00/1M$$50.00/1M
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
SpeedDeliberateDeliberate
Price tierPremiumPremium
Benchmarks
SWE-bench (coding)93.4%93.4%
Arena Elo1,9321,932
MMLU94.2%94.2%

How they compare

Which model wins for each use case — and why.

AvailabilityClaude Fable 5 wins

Fable 5 is generally available to all users and API customers. Mythos 5 is gated to vetted enterprise and research partners.

Raw capabilityTie

Identical model and benchmarks — 80.3% SWE-Bench Pro and 1932 GDPval-AA on both.

Safety profileClaude Fable 5 wins

Fable 5's safeguards block specific high-risk cyber responses, which is the right default for nearly all production use.

Advanced security workClaude Mythos 5 wins

Mythos 5 lifts safeguards for vetted partners doing vulnerability discovery and containment research.

PriceTie

Both are priced identically at $10/$50 per 1M tokens.

Which should you pick?

Pick Claude Fable 5 if…

  • You want the most capable model you can actually access today
  • You need standard, production-safe behavior with high-risk responses blocked
  • You don't have — or don't need — vetted-partner access
View Claude Fable 5 details

Pick Claude Mythos 5 if…

  • You are a vetted enterprise or research partner approved by Anthropic
  • You run advanced cybersecurity workflows that Fable 5's safeguards restrict
  • You need the capability ceiling with safeguards lifted in specific areas
View Claude Mythos 5 details

Bottom line

For most workflows, Claude Fable 5 is the stronger choice.

The strongest coding and reasoning model you can actually use today. 80.3% SWE-Bench Pro is an 11-point leap over Opus 4.8 — the biggest single-release jump of 2026. It costs 2× Opus 4.8, so use it for the hardest agentic and engineering work and keep Opus 4.8 or Sonnet for everyday volume.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Claude Mythos 5 and Fable 5?

They are the same underlying model with the same benchmarks. Fable 5 is generally available with safeguards that block specific high-risk cyber responses. Mythos 5 lifts those safeguards and is restricted to vetted enterprise and research partners.

Can I use Claude Mythos 5?

Only if you are a vetted partner. Mythos 5 access is gated because its safeguards are lifted in high-risk areas. Everyone else uses Fable 5 — the same model, generally available, at the same price.

Is Mythos 5 more powerful than Fable 5?

No. They share the same weights and post identical benchmarks (80.3% SWE-Bench Pro, 1932 GDPval-AA). Mythos 5 only differs in that certain safeguards are removed for approved security and research use.

Why did Anthropic release two versions?

To make Mythos-class capability broadly available safely. Fable 5 brings the capability to everyone with safety controls, while Mythos 5 serves vetted partners who need lifted safeguards for advanced cybersecurity work.

Related comparisons

models/claude fable 5models/claude mythos 5Best AI for Codingchanges

Newsletter

Get model updates before your workflow falls behind

Pricing changes, new model releases, and updated recommendations — delivered when it matters.

No spam. Useful updates only. Affiliate disclosures always clearly labeled.